期刊文献+

基于WBS-RBS的地铁基坑故障树风险识别与分析 被引量:67

Risk identification and analysis of subway foundation pit by using fault tree analysis method based on WBS-RBS
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对地铁基坑工程环境复杂、影响因素多的特点,提出以故障树分析为基础结合工作分解结构(WBS)-风险分解结构(WBS)进行风险识别的方法。此方法引入WBS-RBS将地铁基坑工程工作分解结构和风险源分解结构耦合判断并说明相应风险因素或风险事件,并按照故障树建树原则根据彼此间的逻辑关系,用逻辑门连接上下层事件,形成地铁基坑工程主要故障树。在此基础上,对风险因素进行敏感性分析并提出相应的预防措施。 The engineering environment of subway foundation pit is complex with too many influencing factors; and the analysis of risk factors is incomprehensive due to the uncertainty of risk events in the construction of foundation pit. However, up to now, the conventional risk identification method can't consider all the risk factors. A risk identification method based on the fault tree analysis (FTA) method is proposed to identify the risk factors with the combination of the work breakdown structure (WBS) and risk breakdown structure (RBS). The risk factors or risk events are judged and explained by the coupled analysis of WBS and RBS; and then the fault tree of subway foundation pit risk is established. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis is carried out based on FTA; and then precaution measures of risk events in subway foundation pit are proposed.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第9期2703-2707,2726,共6页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 上海市科学技术委员会科研计划项目(07QB14030) 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ01B04-02)
关键词 地铁基坑 故障树分析 工作分解结构(WBS) 风险分解结构(RBS) 风险识别 敏感性分析 subway foundation pit fault tree analysis work breakdown structure (WBS) risk breakdown structure (RBS) risk identification sensitivity analysis
作者简介 周红波,男,1972年生,工学博士,高级工程师,总工程师,主要从事项目管理、风险管理和岩土工程等方向的研究。E-mail:zhouhongbo72@yahoo.com.cn
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1MATSUO M, KAWAMURA K. A design method of deep excavation in cohesive soil based on the reliability theory[J]. Soils and foundations, 1980, 20(1): 61 --75.
  • 2BJERRUM L, EIDE O. Stability of strutted excavation in clay[J]. Geoteehnique,1996, 6(1): 32--47.
  • 3CHOI H H, CHO H N, SEO J W. Risk assessment methodology for underground construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2004, 3:258--272.
  • 4XU T H, BI S P, CHEN J R. Safety management of deep foundation pit based on construction risk analysis[C]// 2008 Isecs International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, and Management. [S. 1.]: [s. n.], 2008, 3: 268--272.
  • 5HUCHZERMEIER A, LOCH C H. Project management under risk: Using the real options approach to evaluate flexibility in R & D[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47: 85--101.
  • 6WANG J C, HOU W H, WANG X Z. Analysis of accident and risk sources factors for deep foundation pit[J]. Progress in Safety Science and Technology, 2005, (5): 476--481.
  • 7何锡兴,周红波,姚浩.上海某深基坑工程风险识别与模糊评估[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(B11):1912-1915. 被引量:67
  • 8仲景冰,李惠强,吴静.工程失败的路径及风险源因素的FTA分析方法[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2003,20(1):14-17. 被引量:26
  • 9毛金萍,钟建驰,徐伟.深基坑支护结构方案的风险分析[J].建筑施工,2003,25(4):249-252. 被引量:26
  • 10周红波,蔡来炳,高文杰.城市轨道交通车站基坑事故统计分析[J].水文地质工程地质,2009,36(2):67-71. 被引量:66

二级参考文献16

  • 1李惠强,吴静.深基坑支护结构安全预警系统研究[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2002,19(1):61-64. 被引量:31
  • 2周红波,何锡兴,蒋建军,蔡来炳.软土地铁盾构法隧道工程风险识别与应对[J].现代隧道技术,2006,43(2):10-14. 被引量:16
  • 3周红波,姚浩,卢剑华.上海某轨道交通深基坑工程施工风险评估[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(B11):1902-1906. 被引量:65
  • 4郭仲伟.风险分析与决策[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1986..
  • 5烟村洋太郎.失败学のすすめ[M].东京:讲谈社,平成12年(公元2000年)..
  • 6曾宪明,易平,刘春华.基坑与边坡工程事故原因统计分析[C]//中国土木工程学会第九届年会,2000:298-301.
  • 7周红波 赵林 邓绍伦.层次分析法在工程项目风险评估中的应用研究.土木工程学报,2005,:72-77.
  • 8毛儒.地下工程的风险管理[C].工程管理国际研讨会论文集,香港,2004.11,94~98
  • 9梅启智 廖炯生 孙惠中.系统可靠性工程基础[M].北京:科学出版社,1992..
  • 10SHAO R Q. A multi-level fuzzy synthetic evaluation on investment programs in shipping[J]. Transportation Engineering, 2004,144(93):497 - 502.

共引文献167

同被引文献450

引证文献67

二级引证文献416

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部