摘要
清代考据学反对宋明理学的形上思维方法,主张回归汉儒,以训释字义、考证典章制度的方法发明六经之大义,由此引发了清代思想界所谓的"汉宋之争"。章学诚既反对纯粹空谈心性的宋学,也不赞成考据学者对宋学的过分责难。他主张"因事寓理",以调和"虚理"和"实事"的关系,并在宋学之思辨、汉学之考据之外提出了"史学明道"的思想方法,实现了对"汉宋之争"的超越,同时也预示了清中期学术发展的多元化趋向。
The Textology of Qing dynasty （1644-1911） opposed the metaphysical ideology of the Song-Ming Neo-Confucianism. They claimed to interpret the Six Classics by textual exegesis and return to Han studies. It resulted in the disputes between Han studies and Song studies in Qing Dynasty. Zhang Xuecheng agreed neither the Song studies nor the Han studies; his conception was to mediate the contradiction between ＂abstract principle＂ and ＂concrete event＂, and thus forming his idea of ＂the comprehend truth by historical study＂. Zhang xuecheng＇s academic insights transcended the disputes between the Han studies and the Song studies, and forespeak the diversity of academic development in mid-Qing Dynasty.
出处
《湖南城市学院学报》
2009年第3期20-25,共6页
Journal of Hunan City Univeristy
关键词
章学诚
汉宋之争
考据学
史学
Zhang Xuecheng （1738-1801）
Disputes between Han studies and Song studies
textology
historical study
作者简介
周建刚（1971-），江苏苏州人，助理研究员，哲学博士，主要从事中国哲学史研究。
