摘要
关于邱兴华杀人案(下称邱案)的各种学术讨论和争论似乎已经不少,但查阅文献发现,有关邱案的文章,分别是从刑事诉讼法学、刑事证据学、刑事心理学、精神医学角度,法制新闻学以及从人权保护,法治进步等角度对该案进行解读。然而既然这是一个涉及司法鉴定的个案(虽然实际上并没有进行任何实质性鉴定活动),那么从司法鉴定学的角度对与该案有关的几个最基本的问题进行理论阐述,或许能有些许不同的作用。这几个问题包括:精神病概念的辨析,是否患病与是否需要接受刑事处罚之间是什么关系,何时需要启动司法精神医学鉴定?应如何配置我国刑事诉讼中的司法精神医学鉴定启动模式?
On the case of Qiu Xinghua （the case of Qiu）, a variety of academic discussion and debate seems to have a lot. Most of the relevant articles about Qiu＇s case are from the Code of Criminal Procedure, criminal evidence, criminal psychology, psychiatry, legal journalism, the protection of human rights, the rule of law and progress on the points of view. However, I consider, since this is a case involving the judiciary expertise （although in practice no people conducted any substantive identification activities）,so discuss from the perspective of forensic science on fundamental issues, should be able to somewhat different. These issues include Analysis of the concept of mental illness, whether the illness and the need to accept criminal penalties what is the relationship between, when the need forensic psychiatric expertise？ How should China＇s allocation of criminal justice in the spirit of the medical identification start mode？
出处
《犯罪研究》
2008年第5期51-56,61,共7页
Chinese Criminology Review
关键词
司法精神医学
司法鉴定
精神病
司法鉴定学
forensic psychiatry judiciary
expertise mental disease
forensic science
