新现实主义与新自由主义国际关系理论的本体论分析被引量：6

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要在解释层面,新现实主义与新自由主义表现为权力本体与制度本体之争;在现实层面,虽然两者在国际体系无政府状态的理解上有所分歧,但在理论建构中,都接受了国际社会处于无政府状态这一核心假定,把无政府状态设为既定的或给定的事实。并且,新现实主义与新自由主义都秉承物质主义的观念,在国际关系的分析上,以物质性力量为基础进行研究,都坚持物质本体论。

作者徐秀军

机构地区华中师范大学政治学研究院博士研究生

出处《社会主义研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期132-135,共4页 Socialism Studies

关键词新现实主义新自由主义本体论

分类号 D8 [政治法律—外交学]

作者简介徐秀军（1977-），男，华中师范大学政治学研究院博士研究生，主要从事国际政治理论、亚太地区国际关系研究。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献12

1[美]亚历山大·温特秦亚青译.《国际政治的社会理论》[M].上海人民出版社,2000年版.第440-445页.
2Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979, pp. 194-195, 97, 112.
3Robert Gilpin, War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981, p. 7.
4[美]玛沙·芬尼莫尔.《国际社会中的国家利益》.浙江人民出版社,2001年第33页.
5Martin Wight, Power Politics, New York: Holmes & Meier, 1978, p. 102.
6Arthur A. Stein, “Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World”, International Organization, spring 1982, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 299-324.
7Helen V. Milner, “The Assumption of Anarchy in Inter national Relations Theory: A Critique”, Review of International Studies, January 1991, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 70-71:
8Robert O. Keohane, “International Institutions: Can In terdependence Work?” Foreign Policy, spring 1998, No. 110, p. 88.
9Jonathan Mercer, "Anarchy and Identity", International Organization, spring 1995, Vol. 49, No. 2, pp. 229 252.
10Cameron G. Thies, "Are Two Theories Better than One? A Constructivist Model of the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate", International Political Science Review, 2004, Vol. 25, No. 2, p. 162.

二级参考文献21

1Robert O. Keohane. "International Institutions: Two Approaches," in Robert O. Keohane, ed., International Institutions and State Poucer (Boulder: Wesiview,1989). pp. 158-179.
2Jonathan Mercer, "Anachy and Identity." International Organization 49, 2 (Spring 1995). pp. 229-252.
3Jeffrey T. Checkel "The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory," World Politics 50(Summer1998). pp.324-348.
4Ted Hopf. "The Promise of Construetivism in International Relations," International Seearity, Vol 23, No. 1 (Summer 1998 ), pp.171-200.
5Dale C. Copeland, "The Constructivist Challenge to Strueturtd Rcalism"International Security,Vol. 25, No. 2 (Fall 2000), pp. 187-212.
6亚历山大·温特.《国际政治的社会理论》．上海人民出版社2000年版,秦亚青译，第1章.
7温特.《国际政治的社会理论》，第4章和第6章.
8温特.《国际政治的杜会理论》第2章.
9Martha Finnemore, National Interests and International Society (Ithaca: Cornell University Press1996).
10Peter Katzenatein, ed.The Culture of National Security (New York: Columbia University Press,1996).