经济史中制度变迁研究三种范式的比较分析被引量：17

在线阅读下载PDF

导出

摘要分别以马克思、诺斯和埃西姆格鲁为代表的制度变迁理论,是经济史研究中的三种不同范式。埃西姆格鲁为代表的新政治经济学派,以西方主流经济学的研究范式,做出了综合马克思主义史学和新制度经济史学的努力,在理论体系和观点上表现出向马克思主义史学靠拢的迹象,在分析方法和视角上兼备新制度经济史学的特长。从当前经济史研究中分析工具的发展趋势来看,通过计量分析的定量研究,和运用博弈论等工具的逻辑推理,在当前经济史研究中变得越来越重要。这也许正是我们进行经济史研究需要努力的方向。

作者孙圣民徐晓曼

机构地区山东大学经济研究院

出处《文史哲》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期151-158,共8页 Literature,History,and Philosophy

基金教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目“马克思主义产权理论与中国改革开放实践”(项目编号:04JZD007)的成果之一 2007年度山东省社科规划研究项目“新中国农村土地产权制度与经济绩效研究”资助

关键词经济史制度变迁新政治经济学派马克思诺斯埃西姆格鲁

分类号 F091.349 [经济管理—政治经济学]

作者简介孙圣民，山东大学经济研究院（中心）讲师，山东大学历史学博士后科研流动站科研人员；徐晓曼，山东大学经济研究院（中心）副教授（山东济南250100）。

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1韩毅.西方制度经济史学的历史演进:评价与思考[J].中国经济史研究,2002(3):137-145. 被引量：11
2道格拉斯·C·诺斯著.《西方世界的兴起》.北京:华夏出版社,1999年.
3道格拉斯·C·诺斯著.《经济史中的结构与变迁》.上海:上海三联书店,1194年.
4道格拉斯·C·诺斯著.《制度、制度变迁与经济绩效》.上海:上海人民出版社,1994年.
5North,Douglas, The New Institutional Economics And Development, http://ideas, repec, org/p/wpa/wuwpeh/9309002, html, 1993 - 09 - 01 .
6道格拉斯·C·诺斯.《理解经济变迁过程》,北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008年.
7Acemoglu, Doron, Simon Johenson and James A. Robinson,“Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002,118 : 1231 - 1294.
8Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson,“The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation,” American Economic Review, December, 2001,91, (5) :1369 - 1401.
9Aeemoglu, D. , S. Johnson and J. Robinson, “The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change, and Economic Growth,” American Economic Review, 2005a, 95:546 - 579.
10Acemoglu, D. , S. Johnson and J. Robinson, “Institutions as the Fundamental Cause of Long-Run Growth", Handbook of Economic Growth, Philippe A. and S. Durlauf, eds. , North Holland, 2005b, NBER Working Paper, No, w10481.

二级参考文献13

1Greif, Avner (1993a). "Reputation and Coalitions in Medieval Trade:Evidence on the Maghribi Traders." Journal of Economic History, 49 (4) (December): pp. 857 - 882.
2(1993b). "Contract Enforceability and Economic Institutions in Early Trade: the Maghribi Trades' coalition." American Economic Review ,83(3) (June):pp.525 -48.
3(1994a). "Trading Institution and Commercial Revolution in Medieval Ettrope," in Abel Aganbegyan, 01eg Bogomolov, and Micheal Kaset. Eds., Economics in a changing world, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan, pp. 115 - 25.
4(1994b). "Cultural Beliefs and the Organization of Society: A Historical and Theoretical Reflection on Collectivist and Individualist Societies." Journal of Political Economy, 102(5) (October) :pp.912 - 50.
5(1997a): "Microtheory and Resent Developments in the Study of Institutions Through Economic History," in David M.Kerps and Kenneth F. Wallis,eds., Advances in economic theory, vol. 11. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,c1997.
6(1997b) "Economic History and Game Theory: a Survey", Working Paper,Stanford University.
7(1997c): "On the Interrelations and Economic Implications of Economic, Social, Political, and Normative Factors:Reflections from Two Late Medieval Societies", In "The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economic", by Drobak, New York,c1997.
8(1997d). "Solf-Enforcing Political System and Economic Growth: Late Medieval Genoa." Working paper, Stanford University Press.
9(1997e). "On the Historical Development and Social Foundations of Institutions that Facilitate Impersonal Exchange."Working paper, Stanford University.
10(1998). "Historical and Comparative Institutional Analysis." American Economic Review. May, 1998. p,80- 84.