期刊文献+

基于Logistic回归模型的砂土液化概率评价 被引量:13

Probabilistic evaluation of sand liquefaction based on Logistic regression model
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 以国内外23次地震中200组场地液化实测数据为基础,通过Logistic回归分析,建立关联修正标准贯入击数N160cs与循环应力比CSR的液化概率模型。以50%液化概率水平为液化与非液化的临界点,建立了指数形式的抗液化应力比CRR计算式,新建概率模型预测饱和砂土液化与非液化的成功率分别为85.71%和76.14%,具有较高的可靠性。与已有模型比较,使用了新的数据和修正系数,消除了一些不合理的偏差,总体判别结果偏于安全。为了将确定性分析方法与概率分析方法联系起来,建立了抗液化安全系数FS与液化概率PL的关系式。算例结果表明,新建概率模型简单、实用、可靠。 A simple model for evaluating liquefaction probability using standard penetration test (SPT) data is developed based on logistic regression analysis of 200 sets case histories of 23 earthquakes. The proposed model uses corrected blow count (N160cs and cyclic stress ratio (CSR) as input parameters. When liquefaction probability level is equal to 50 % as a limit state, the formulation of cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) was proposed with an exponent and the proposed model's reliability for liquefaction and non-liquefaction estimation of saturated sands is 85.71% and 76.14 %, respectively. Comparisons of the proposed probability model with previously proposed deterministic and probabilistic approaches are performed to demonstrate the slightly conservation, because the new test data and modified coefficients are used in this analysis, so some sources of uncertainty and variance are eliminated. In order to correlate deterministic approach and probability approach, the relationship between the factor of safety against liquefaction and liquefaction probability is proposed. Five case records are further analyzed to demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed method.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期2567-2571,共5页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(No.50578029) 教育部创新团队发展计划(No.IRT0518)
关键词 液化评价 回归模型 标准贯入 砂土 地震 liquefaction evaluation regression model standard penetration test sand earthquake
作者简介 潘建平,男,1978年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学科研工作。E-mail:pjp4057@sohu.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1汪明武,罗国煜.可靠性分析在砂土液化势评价中的应用[J].岩土工程学报,2000,22(5):542-544. 被引量:29
  • 2佘跃心,刘汉龙,高玉峰.场地液化势评价概率模型[J].工程勘察,2002,30(5):4-7. 被引量:12
  • 3佘跃心.砂土液化判别方法可靠性评价[J].岩土力学,2004,25(5):803-807. 被引量:18
  • 4佘跃心.二维场地液化势预测的神经网络方法[J].岩土力学,2004,25(10):1569-1574. 被引量:4
  • 5陈国兴,李方明.基于径向基函数神经网络模型的砂土液化概率判别方法[J].岩土工程学报,2006,28(3):301-305. 被引量:50
  • 6LIAO S S C, VENEZIANO D, WHITMAN R V Regression models for evaluating liquefaction probability [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1988, 114(4): 389-411.
  • 7YOUD T L, NOBLE S K. Liquefaction criteria based statistical and probabilistic analysis[C]// Proceedings of NCEER Workshop on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soil, Technical report No: NCEER-97-0022, New York: State University of New York at Buffalo, 1997: 201 -216.
  • 8JUANG C H, JIANG T, ANDRUS R D. Assessing probability-based methods for liquefaction potential evaluation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviron-mental Engineering, 2002, 128(7): 580-589
  • 9CETIN K O, SEED R B, KIUREGHIAN A D, et al Standard penetration test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004, 130(12): 1314-1340.
  • 10LAI S Y, CHANG W J, Lin P S. Logistic regression model for evaluating soil liquefaction probability using CPT data [J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(6): 694-704

二级参考文献35

  • 1苏经宇,周锡元,樊水荣,高小旺.土层地震液化的危险性分析[J].建筑科学,1994,10(1):37-42. 被引量:7
  • 2谢君斐.关于修改抗震规范砂土液化判别式的几点意见[J].地震工程与工程振动,1984,4(2):95-126.
  • 3石兆吉,张荣祥,顾宝和.砂土液化判别和评价综合方法研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,1997,17(1):82-88. 被引量:36
  • 4GB50011-2001.建筑抗震设计规范[S].[S].,..
  • 5周锡元 王广军 等.场地地基设计地震[M].北京:地震出版社,-..
  • 6唐山地震砂土液化联合研究小组.唐山地震砂土液化现场勘察资料研究报告[R].北京:北京市勘察处,1983,2.26-41.
  • 7Seed H B, Idriss I M. Simplified procedure for evaluatingsoil liquefacfion potential[J]. Journal of Soil Mechanicsand Foundation Division, American Society of CivilEngineers, 1971, 97(9): 1 249- 1 273.
  • 8Youd T L, Idriss I M. Liquefaction resistance of soils:summary report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefactionresistance of soils[J]. Journal of Geotechnical andGeoenvironmental Enginees, American Society of CivilEngin
  • 9Liao S S C, Veneziano D, Whitman R V. Regressionmodels for evaluating liquefaction probability[J]. Journalof Geotechnical Engineering Division, AmericanSociety of Civil Enginees, 1988, 114(4): 389-411.
  • 10Juang C H, Chon, C J, Tao Jiang, Andurs R D. Risk-basedliquefaction potential evaluation using standardpenetration tests[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2000, 37:1 195-1 208.

共引文献90

同被引文献122

引证文献13

二级引证文献71

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部