摘要
鲁迅《魏晋风度及文章与药及酒之关系》出现许多知识错误,本文纠正如下:曹丕的谥号不是孝文帝;何晏不是第一个吃五石散的人,五石散也不是"毒药";晋人穿宽大衣服和木屐都不是因为吃五石散;要求和阮籍结亲、杀害嵇康、受到何曾劝告的人不是司马懿;讲"中国之君子,明于礼义而陋于知人心"的不是季札;嵇康打铁事不见于《与山巨源绝交书》;"不肖"不仅仅是"儿子不像父亲";东晋的人也会写文章;陶渊明从来没有"便伸了足穿上了"。
There are many scientific mistakes＇in the article by Lu Xun. We correct his mistakes just like that： the honorific of Cao Pi after his death is not ＂Xiao Wen＂ emperor. He Yan is not the first man who used ＂Wu Shi San＂ which is not poison. People of Jin Dynasty wore spacious clothes and wooden shoes, which has nothing to do with using ＂Wu Shi San＂. It is not Sima Yi who wanted to associate with Ruan Ji by marriage and killed Ji Kang. It＇ s not Sima Yi who was advised by He Zeng. It＇ s not Ji Zha who said that gentleman in Central Plains was good at courtesy but not good at understanding human nature. Ji Kang forged iron, which was not recorded in the article of breaking off relations with Shan Ju - yuan. ＂Unworthy＂ does not only mean that the child takes after his father. People in Eastern Jin Dynasty can also compose literary works. Tao Yuan - ming had never worn the ＂shoes＂.
出处
《中国文学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2008年第3期55-58,共4页
Research of Chinese Literature
关键词
鲁迅
五石散
阮籍
嵇康
陶渊明
Lu Xun
Wu Shi San
Ruan Ji
Ji Kang
Tao Yuan - ming
作者简介
张海英（1971-），女，湖南宁乡人，湖南大学岳麓书院博士研究生，湖南大学期刊社编辑.
张松辉（1953-），男，河南唐河人，湖南大学岳麓书院教授，博士生导师。
