期刊文献+

父母用应对方式量表在我国慢性病患儿家长中的适用性研究 被引量:63

Study of application of the chinese version of CHIP for parents of children with chronic disease
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的引进美国护理专家McCubbin博士发展的父母用应对方式量表(The Coping Health Inventory for Parents,CHIP)并检验其在中国文化背景下的适用性。方法研究分两个阶段:第1个阶段翻译并形成中文版CHIP量表,由专家小组对其表面效度和内容效度进行评定;第2个阶段采用中文版CHIP量表对132例慢性病患儿的父母进行调查,对量表的内部一致性进行评定。结果中文版CHIP量表各条目具有较好的文化相关性,内容效度指数(CVI)为0.82;3个分量表的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.92、0.80、0.76,量表总体Cronbach'sα系数为0.91。被调查者认为"保持家庭团结、合作和乐观态度"对维持正常的家庭生活最为有用,而"寻求社会支持,维护自尊和心理稳定"的作用最小。40岁以下患儿父母的CHIP量表得分高于40岁以上年龄组,父母的受教育水平越高,其CHIP量表的得分也越高,差异有显著性意义。结论中文版CHIP量表具有较好的信度和效度,对于了解慢性病患儿父母的应对方式有一定帮助,适合在我国使用。 Objective To introduce the Coping Health Inventory for Parents(CHIP) scale and evaluate the applicability under the Chinese culture background. Methods The study comprised two phases. Firstly the scale was translated into Chinese and the content validity of the Chinese version of the CHIP was evaluated by an expert; secondly, a sample of 132 parents of children with chronic diseases were recruited to complete the scale to evaluate the internal consistency of the Chinese version of the CHIP. Results The CVI of the Chinese version of the CHIP was 0.82; the Cronbach's α for the whole scale was 0.91 and 0.92,0.80,0.76 for three subscales. The strategies aimed at maintaining family integration, cooperation and optimistic outlook were ranked as being the most helpful. Age and educational level of subjects were found as the influencing factors in the variables examined. Conclusions The Chinese version of the CHIP is reliable and valid, it can help us understand the coping strategies of parents of children with chronic diseases.
作者 李杨 魏珉
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第11期972-975,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 双亲 儿童 慢性病 应对方式 信度 效度 Parents Child Chronic disease Coping strategy Reliability Validity
作者简介 李杨:女,硕士,副教授,E-mail:liyang3413@sina.com
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Cohen MS. Families coping with childhood chronic illness: A research Review[J]. Famihes, Systems, and Health, 1999, 17(2):149-164.
  • 2Allen PJ, Vessey JA. Primary care of the child with a chronic condition [M]. 4th ed. Mosby, St Louis, MO, 2004: 45-48.
  • 3Patistea E. Description and adequacy of parental coping behaviors in childhood leukemia[J]. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2005, 42 : 283-296.
  • 4Mu PF. Paternal reactions to a child with epilepsy: Uncertainty, coping strategies, and depression[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2005, 49 (4) :367-376.
  • 5Hovey JK. Fathers parenting chronically ill children: Concerns and coping strategies[J]. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 2005, 28: 83 -95.
  • 6MeCubbin HI, MeCubbin MA, Patterson JM, et al. Coping health inventory for parents: An assessment of parental coping patterns in the care of the chronically ill children[J]. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 1983, 45(2) :359-370.
  • 7Jones PS, Lee JW, Phillips LR, et al. An adaptation of Brislin's translation model for cross-cultural research [J]. Nursing Research, 2001, 50(5): 300-304.
  • 8Han HR. Korean mother's psyehosocial adjustment to their children's cancer[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2003, 44(5) :499-506.
  • 9Tak YR, Mc Cubbin M. Family stress, perceived social support and coping following the diagnosis of a child's congenital heart disease[J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 2002, 39(2):190-198.
  • 10Goldbeck L. Parental coping with the diagnosis of childhood cancer: Gender effects, dissimilarity within couples, and quality of life[J]. Psycho-Oncology, 2001, 10:325-335.

二级参考文献15

  • 1王海军,徐克静.问卷调查中的信度和效度问题[J].中国健康教育,1994,10(11):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 2郭永松,李秀央,卢文军,Johannes Siegrist.工作中付出-获得不平衡与健康的相关性研究[J].中华劳动卫生职业病杂志,2005,23(3):232-234. 被引量:23
  • 3颜文伟.检验一致性的统计方法[J].中华神经精神科杂志,1986,19(6):367-371.
  • 4左积乾.医学统计学与电脑实验(第一版)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1997.245.
  • 5左积乾,医学统计学与电脑实验,1997年,245页
  • 6金丕焕,医用统计方法(第2版),1993年,281页
  • 7颜文伟,中华神经精神科杂志,1986年,19卷,6期,367页
  • 8Siegrist J.Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions.J Occup Health Psychol,1996,1:27-41.
  • 9Hanson EK,Schaufeli W,Vrijkotte T,et al.The validity and reliability of the Dutch Effort-Reward Imbalance Questionnaire.J Occup Health Psychol,2000,5:142-155.
  • 10Niedhammer I,Tek ML,Starke D,et al.Effort-reward imbalance model and self-reported health:cross-sectional and prospective findings from the GAZEL cohort.Soc Sci Med,2004,58:1531-1541.

共引文献146

同被引文献682

引证文献63

二级引证文献458

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部