5[1]Lewin A, Weiss DB, Friedler S, et al. Delivery following intracytoplasmic injection of mature sperm cells recovered by testicular fine needle aspiration in a case of hypergonadotropic azoospermia due to maturation arrest. Hum Reprod 1996; 11:769-771
6[2]Lewin A, Reubinoff B, Porat-Katz A, et al. Testicular fine needle aspiration: the alternative method for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:1785-1790
7[3]Reubinoff BE, Abeliovich D, Wener M, et al. A birth in non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome after testicular fine needle aspiration, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1887-1892
8Tuuri T, Moilanen J, Kaukoranta S, et al. Testicular biopty gun needle biopsy in collecting spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic injection, cryopreservation and histology. Hum Reprod, 1999;14(5): 1274.
9A1-Jitawi SA, A1-Ramahi SA, Hakooz BA.Diagnostic role of testicular fine needle aspiration biopsy in male infertility. Acta Cytol, 1997;41(6):1705.
10Mourad WA, Tulbah A, Merdad T, et al. Fineneedle aspiration of the testis in azoospermic men:The value of measuring serum follicle stimulating hormone and testicular size. Diagn Cytopathol, 2005;2(4) :185.
6Berkovitz A, Ehes F, Ellenbogen A, et al. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod, 2006, 21 (7) : 1787-1790.
7Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, et al. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril, 2000, 73 (6) : 1155-1158.
8Jequier AM. Clinical andrology-still a major problem in the treatment of infertility. Hum Reprod, 2004, 19(6) : 1245-1249.
9Check ML, Bollendoff A, Check JH, et al. Reevaluation of the clinical importance of evaluating sperm morphology using strict criteria. Arch Androl, 2002, 48 (1) : 1-3.
10Cooper TG, Yeung CH, Fetic S, et al. Cytoplasmic droplets are normal structures of human sperm but are not well preserved by routine procedures for assessing sperm morphology. Hum Reprod, 2004, 19(10) : 2283-2288.
