摘要
我国现行《刑法》和《刑事诉讼法》虽然对追缴犯罪所得做出相关的规定,但尚未形成较为系统的追缴犯罪所得制度,与《联合国反腐败公约》确立的腐败犯罪资产追缴与返还机制以及英美法系国家专门的犯罪所得立法还有较大差距,不利于在平等互惠的基础上开展追缴职务犯罪所得国际司法合作。应当结合《联合国反腐败公约》中追缴腐败犯罪所得机制,借鉴英美法系国家较为成熟的专门立法,建立和完善中国追缴职务犯罪所得制度,从而为全面开展境外追赃提供法律支撑。
Though the contents of seizing and confiscating the proceeds of crime have been stipulated under the current China＇s Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law, yet systematical measures for the recovery of proceeds of crime have not formed. The great gap still exists between the mechanisms for recovery of property that established in the United Nations Convention against Corruption and the specialized legislations of proceeds of crime in the Anglo-American countries and those in China. The existing difference will definitely block the effective international cooperation on the basis of equality and reciprocity in the future. Nowadays, it is a great necessity to use the mechanisms of recovery of property in the United Nations Convention against Corruption and successful specialized legislation in Anglo-American nations for reference in the legislation of China, so as to provide enough legal support for the future international cooperation in confiscation.
出处
《当代法学》
北大核心
2007年第3期52-57,共6页
Contemporary Law Review
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究中青年项目(06SFB3013)
关键词
追缴职务犯罪所得
司法合作
缺席审判
没收资产返还
seizure and confiscation of the proceeds of corruption crime
judiciary cooperation
absent trial
return and ddsposal of proceeds of crime
civil forfeiture.
作者简介
王学成（1962-），男，宁夏中卫人，法学博士，广东省人民检察院副检察长；
张健（1970-），男，吉林长春人，法学博士，广东省人民检察院法律政策研究室副主任。
