期刊文献+

休谟难题:能否从“是”推出“应该”? 被引量:8

Hume's Puzzle:Can "To Be" Be Deducted from "Ought ToBe"
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 “应该如何”是客体的“事实如何”与主体的需要、欲望、目的发生关系时所产生的属性,是“事实如何”对主体的需要、欲望、目的的效用:客体事实属性是应该如何产生的源泉和存在的实体;主体需要、欲望、目的则是它们从客体事实属性中产生的条件和标准。因此,“应该如何”是通过主体的需要、欲望、目的,而从“事实如何”产生和推导出的:“应该”等于事实对主体需要欲望目的的符合;“不应该”等于事实对主体需要欲望目的的不符合。这就是“应该如何”的产生和推导过程,这就是破解休谟难题之谜底。 " Ought to be " is the attribute produced from the relation between the fact of "to be" and the needs, desires, purpose of the subject. It is the utility the fact does to the needs, desires, purpose of subject. The object fact attribute is the source producing "ought to be". Subject's needs, desires and purpose are conditions and standards rising from object fact attribute. So, "ought to be" is derived from the fact of To be through the needs, desires, purpose of subject. "Ought to be" is equal to the fact satisfying the needs,desire and purpose of the subject. "Not ought to be "is equal to the fact not according with the needs, desire and purpose of the subject. This is the course of production and deriving of "ought to be". It is the answer to the Hume problem.
作者 王海明
机构地区 北京大学哲学系
出处 《湖南师范大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期32-36,共5页 Journal of Social Science of Hunan Normal University
基金 “北京大学创建世界一流大学计划”经费资助
关键词 休谟难题 “是” “应该” Hume problem to be ought to be
作者简介 王海明(1950-),男,吉林白城人,北京大学哲学系教授,博士生导师。
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Oliver A. Johnson, Ethics Selections From Classical and Contemporary Writers Fourth Edition Holt[M]. Rinehart and Winston,Inc New York 1978.
  • 2W. D. Hudson.The Is - Ought Question: A Ccollection of Papers on the Central Problem in Moral Philosophy [M]. ST.Martin's Press, New York, 1969.
  • 3Ralph Barton Perry. General Theory of Value its meaning And Basic Principles Construed In Terms Of Interest Longmans[M]. Green And Company 55 Fifth Avenue, New York, 1926.
  • 4穆勒.功用主义[M].北京:商务印书馆,1957..
  • 5马斯洛.人性能达到的境界[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,1987..
  • 6Lawrence C. Becker. Encyclopedia of Ethics Volume II [M].Garland Publishing, Inc. New York, 1992.
  • 7John K. Roth. International Encyclopedia of Ethics, Printed by Braun-Brumfield Inc U. C, 1995.
  • 8罗素.宗教与科学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1982..
  • 9Charles L. Stervenson. Facts and Values :Studies in Ethical Analysis[M]. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1963.

共引文献90

同被引文献55

引证文献8

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部