期刊文献+

结构实在论评析 被引量:14

A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 曹天予提出的结构实在论知识论版本在科学哲学界有很大影响,并引发了《综合》期刊专刊讨论。他既批评反实在论的观点,也对结构实在论的知识版本与本体版本有所批判。他从结构、本体、建构这三个概念出发,论证了科学理论的客观性体现为建构性、历史性、整体性、修正性、革命性。本文对曹天予的结构实在论进行了系统的梳理与分析。笔者赞同他对“不充分决定”论旨的批评,对他批评“本体论不连续性”持中立态度,但对他的“普遍语法论证”有所存疑。 The epistemological version of structural realism, raised by prof. CAO Tian Yu, has great influence in philosophy of science. Syntheses had a special volume to discuss the topic. Cao criticizes anti-realism, as well as the epistemic version and the ontic version of structural realism. From the concepts of structure, ontology, and construct, he analyzes the objectivity of scientific thcories into five aspects: construction, historicity, holism, revision, and revolution. The paper gives a systematic analysis and comment of his philosophy. The author agrees with his criticism of under-determination thesis, is neutral to his argument against ontological discontinuity, but questions his universal language argument.
作者 王巍
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2006年第11期34-38,48,共6页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 结构实在论 结构 本体 建构 structural realism structure ontology construction
作者简介 王巍(1971-),江苏丹阳人,清华大学科技与社会研究中心副教授,主要研究方向为科学哲学.
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1J Symons.Editorial[J].Syntheses,136,2003.1-2.
  • 2B Van Fraassen.The Scientific Image[M].Oxford:Clarendon Press,1980.8,6-40.
  • 3T Kuhn.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions[M].University of Chicago Press,2nd enlarged ed.,1970.206.
  • 4H Putnam.Meaning and the Moral Sciences[M].London:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1978.25.
  • 5G Maxwell.The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities[Z].In:Curd M,Cover J A ed.Philosophy of Science:The Central Issues.New York:W.W.Norton & Company,1998.1052-1063.
  • 6G Harman.The Inference to the Best Explanation[J].Philosophical Review,74,1965.88-95.
  • 7W Sellars.Science,Perception,and Reality[M].Longdon:Routledge and Kegan Paul,1963.121-123.
  • 8H Putnam.Mathematics,Matter and Method[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1975.Vol.1.69.
  • 9T Y Cao.Structural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory[J].Syntheses,136,2003.11,1-2,6,6,10,3-4,16,4,22.
  • 10曹天予在清华大学科技与社会研究中心的演讲整理稿.

同被引文献95

  • 1胡新和.“实在”概念辨析与关系实在论[J].哲学研究,1995(8):19-26. 被引量:7
  • 2赵国求.自在实体、现象实体与物理实在[J].自然辩证法研究,2006,22(11):39-43. 被引量:3
  • 3桂起权,宋伟.充实的真空观:量子场的实在论与生成辩证法[J].河南社会科学,2007,15(2):79-82. 被引量:11
  • 4Boyd, R. , "The Current Status of the Realism Debate", in J. Leplin (ed.), Scientific Realism, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984,pp. 41 - 82.
  • 5Psillos, S. , "Scientific Realism and the ' Pessimistic Induction' ", Philosophy of Science , 63 : 1996, S. 306.
  • 6http ://www. lse. ac. uk/collections/CPNSS/projects/structuralism/structuralRealismBibliography. html.
  • 7Psillos, S. , Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth, London and New York : Routledge, 1999,p. xxii, p. 103.
  • 8Putnam, H., Mathematics, Matter and Method,Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975, p. 73.
  • 9Laudan, L. , "A Confutation of Realism", 1981, Philosophy of Science, reprinted in Papineau, D (ed), The Philosophy of Science, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 121 - 122.
  • 10Psillos, S. , Is Structural Realism the Best of Both Worlds .?, 1995, Dialectica, 49 : 15 - 46, pp. 16 - 17, pp. 15 - 46.

引证文献14

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部