1See Douglas Walton, Argumentation methods for artificial intelligence in law, New York: Springer, 2005, pp. 6-9, pp. 54-63.
2Ronald P. Loui, A Citation--Based Reflection on Toulmin and Argument, Argumentation, Vol. 16 (2002) ,No. 3. p. 260.
3See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2003(Updated ed. ), pp. 12-13, p. 15.
4See Stephen Toulmin, Richard Rieke and Allan Janik, An Introduction to Reasoning, New York . Macmillan, 1979, p. 78, p.78, pp. 203-309.
5See Stephen Toulmin, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999(Reprinted), p. 7, p. 42, p.43, p. 255, pp. 94-141.
6See David Hitchcock and Bart Verheij, The Toulmin Model Today: Introduction to the Special Issue on Contemporary Work Using Stephen Edelston Toulmin's Layout of Arguments, Argumentation, Vol. 19(2005),No. 3, p. 255.
7See R. Schmidt, Influence of the Legal Paradigm, in Peter Murphy ed. , Evidence, Proof, and Facts: A Book of Sources, New York:Oxford University Press Inc, 2003, pp. 103-105, pp. 293-298, p. 289.
8See David Hitchcock, The practice of argumentative discussion, Argumentation,Vol. 16 (2002), No. 3. p. 291, pp. 78-80, p.162.
9See Ralph H. Johnson, Manifest Rationalty, A Pragmatic Theory of Argument, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. ,2000, p. 45.
10See Douglas Walton, The New Dialectic :Conversational Contexts of Argument, Toronto : University of Toronto Press, 1998.
