摘要
当代中国法治话语需要体现逻辑,缺失逻辑的法治话语只是概念的堆砌,无法产生实际效果。逻辑是作为知识体系的法治话语独立性的保障,是法治话语发挥作用的前提,是法治话语自身科学性的依托。目前,中国法治话语逻辑缺失的代表性问题是话语系统内表述的矛盾和重要概念阐释的偏差。中国法治话语实现逻辑自洽应从如下方面着眼:法治话语的观点表达,法律的解释和评述,法治话语核心表述的设计与解释、评述。
The discourse of the rule of law in contemporary China needs to reflect the significance of logic.The discourse of the rule of law without logic is just a pile of concepts,which can not have a practical impact.Logic is the premise of the rule of law discourse,and logic is the scientific basis of the rule of law discourse.At present,there are two aspects of the lack of logic in the discourse of rule of law in China:the contradiction in the discourse and the deviation in the interpretation of important concepts.In order to rectify the deviation of the deficiency and improve the logic of the discourse of rule of law,we should do:the interpretation and comment of law should be logical;The design of the core expression of the rule of law discourse should be logical;The explanation and comment on the core expression of the rule of law discourse should be logical.
出处
《盛京法律评论》
2021年第2期3-25,共23页
Shengjing Law Review
关键词
法治话语
逻辑
矛盾与偏差
回应与完善
discourse of rule of law
logica contradiction and deviation
response and perfection
作者简介
邹鹏,华东政法大学上海市社会科学创新研究基地副研究员,研究方向:法治理论教育法学
