摘要
有些学者认为曾子继承和发展了孔子的孝道思想,本文对此不敢苟同。《论语》中的“曾子曰”记的是曾子的思想;《大戴礼记.曾子大孝》中的“曾子曰”记的是曾子的后学的思想。该篇对孝的泛化完全背离了孔子孝道思想的精神,从而与《论语》中的曾子的思想不相符合。这种对孝的泛化不是为了克服仁孝关系原理上的矛盾,而是对孔子孝道思想教条化、片面化,并已露出“愚孝”的苗头。
This article does not agree with the argument that Zengzi, a young disciple of Confucius, inherited and enriched his master＇s thought of filial piety. It claims that what “Zengzi Said”in Analeets of Confucius （Lunyu） was Zengzi＇s thought, and what “Zengzi Said”in Zeng Zi Da Xiao was the thought of Zengzi＇ s disciples. Zeng Zi Da Xiao＇ s universalization of the filial piety deviated the spirit of Confucius＇ thought and didn＇t accord with Zengzi＇s thought.The universalization is not for overcoming the contradiction of Ren-Filial Piety Theory. It dogmatised Confucius＇ thought and revealed the sign of the absolute and foolish filial piety which prevailed in the Chinese society since Han Dynasty.
出处
《湖北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2006年第1期8-11,共4页
Journal of Hubei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
作者简介
何元国（1966-），男，湖北应城人，湖北大学历史文化学院讲师，北京师范大学历史系博士生。
