摘要
从HPS到CSSK的转变,在分析和解释科学知识的认知规范性方面出现了困境,皮克林和劳斯的理论有助于说明其中的一些困境。为达到此目标,文中首先分析了从HPS到CSSK的转变;接着考察了CSSK中关于科学实践的两种代表性的观点;然后提出一些科学知识的认识规范性的认知困境。
The transition from HPS to CSSK generated difficulties in the analysis and explanation of epistemic normativity of scientific knowledge, and Pickering＇ s and Rouse＇ s theories will illustrate some of these difficulties. In order to achieve that aim, firstly, I will analyze the transition from HPS to CSSK. Then, examine two representative notions of scientific practice in the CSSK. Lastly, present some epistemic difficulties of the epistemic normativity of scientific knowledge .
出处
《科学学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第6期721-725,共5页
Studies in Science of Science
作者简介
哥德弗瑞·古劳闵（Godfrey Guillaumin），男，墨西哥人，教授，研究方向为科学哲学，科学社会学。
