摘要
“两委矛盾”是一个被国内研究村民自治问题的学者广泛接受和使用的概念,这个概念被研究者赋予了约定俗成的经验性涵义。事实上,“两委矛盾”是一个具有选择性偏见的简单化概念,不能准确、深刻地反映农村“两委”关系以及农村社会政治关系的真实状况。如果离开了党支部独揽专权、党支部书记与村委会主任的个人矛盾、宗族组织的影响以及农村黑恶势力的渗透等具体因素,“两委矛盾”就不具有实质性涵义。这一概念的简单使用造成人们对村民自治问题的诸多误解。自治制度背景下,农村党支部与村委会并不是天生的对立面,“两委关系”也存在协商合作的可能性。因此,在研究农村“两委”关系时,应当谨慎使用“两委矛盾”这一概念,对具体问题进行具体的分析和判断。
Two committees＇ conflict is a widespread initialization concept in the field of village self-governance research. Many Chinese scholars endow this concept with empirical implications. Yet, on the view of methodology, we find that, two committees＇ conflict is a simplized concept with selective bias ; it can＇t explain the real social political situations in rural China today. Under the background of village self-governance, the relationship between the Party＇s Branch of CPC and the Village Committee is not opposite inherently; there have being the possibilities of deliberative corporations between the two organizations. Thus, we must give up the unscientific concept when studying the social-political relationship and public power structure in rural China, try to return to the original situations of power struggle in rural China, give an exact mechanism explanation as well as rational judgment.
出处
《华中师范大学学报（人文社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第5期18-24,共7页
Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金
教育部重点研究基地重大招标项目"我国农村和农民问题研究"(D3JZD0031)
关键词
村民自治
“两委矛盾”
选择性偏见
方法论批评
villager self-governance
two committees conflict
selective bias
methodological criticism
作者简介
王金红（1965-），男，湖北天门人，华南师范大学政治与行政学院教授，中山大学地方治理研究所特邀研究员，主要从事政治学理论、地方治理及基层民主研究。
