摘要
乾嘉时期,钱大昕对汉学、宋学和清代学术进行了较为系统的评论。在治经的理念和方法上,钱大昕推崇汉学,以汉儒治经的方法为标准衡评后世学术,具有汉学家的立场,但同时又力戒今古文门户,尽量以持平之心审视学术发展。对于宋学,钱大昕从工具和思想两个层面上进行了评论和驳难,剖析宋儒所倡导的“性”、“理”、“道”等范畴,给以新的解释,并以日常伦理来批评理学的思辨,有误读宋儒的地方。他总结出清学崇尚古学、实事求是、重视经史、经世致用的特点,同时又批评了清儒过分尊经泥古的弊病。
QIAN Da-xin made comments on the Han School of Classical Philology, the Song School of Classical Philology and the academic study in Qing Dynasty, praising highly the Han School of Classical Philology without any sectarian bias. He criticized the Song School of Classical Philology commenting on Confucian＇s thoughts according to the daily ethics, so there were some misinterpretations of the Song School of Classical Philology existing in many places. He drew some conclusions on the features of the academic study in Qing Dynasty, as well as making some criticisms on the defects of the Confucians in Qing Dynasty such as their over-conservatism.
出处
《河南师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
北大核心
2005年第5期79-83,共5页
Journal of Henan Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词
钱大昕
经学批评
汉学
宋学
清学
QIAN Da-xin
criticism on Study of Confucian Classics
the Han School of Classical Philology
the Song School of Classical Philology~ the academic study in Qing Dynasty
作者简介
王记录（1964-），男，河南范县人．河南师范大学社会发展学院教授，历史学博士，硕士生导师，主要从事中国史学史、历史文献学和清代学术的教学与研究。
