摘要
“问题与主义”之争为时不长,却触及一些时代关注的焦点,反映出“五四”前后中国思想界异常丰富而活跃的动态,特别是各种流派混杂难分、阵线混淆的重要特征。关注“社会”的革命或改良是时代的共同点,包括安福系在内的朝野各方都以为不可避免。这样的朝野相似性使“新舆论界”一边希望有所“区分”,以确立自身的特性。有些后来以为冲突的观念,对当时当地的当事人而言,未必就那样对立,反有相通之处。胡适和李大钊的相关言论在一段时间里共同成为年轻一辈的思想资源,提示着这一争论未必像后来认知的那样意味着新文化人的“分裂”,或即使“分裂”
Though the controversy over “problems and doctrines” did not last for a long time, it touched on some focal issues of the time, and reflected the unusually rich and active dynamics of Chinese intellectual circles before and after the May Fourth Movement, showing in particular the mixed factions and confused boundaries which important characteristics thereof. A concern over “social” revolution or reform was pervasive at the time, and all governmental and non-governmental circles thought that it was inevitable, including even the Anfu Clique. Such a similarity between the views of governmental and non-governmental circles made the “New Press Circle” desire a certain amount of “differentiation” in order to establish its own character. Some ideas which later periods saw as conflicting were not considered to be necessarily contradictory by people involved at the time. On the contrary, they saw such ideas as sharing common points. For a time, the younger generation drew on the opinions of both Hu Shi and Li Dazhao concerning the controversy. This shows that the controversy did not imply a “split” among new intellectuals as seen by later generations. Even if there was a “split,” it was not as deep as suggested by existing scholarship.
出处
《近代史研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2005年第3期44-82,共39页
Modern Chinese History Studies
