期刊文献+

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil vs cyclosporine administration on graft survival and function after islet allotransplantation in diabetic rats 被引量:7

Effects of mycophenolate mofetil vs cyclosporine administration on graft survival and function after islet allotransplantation in diabetic rats
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To develop an experimental model of islet allotransplantation in diabetic rats and to determine the positive or adverse effects of MMF as a single agent. METHODS: Thirty-six male Wistar rats and 18 male Lewis rats were used as recipients and donors respectively. Diabetes was induced by the use of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. Unpurified islets were isolated using the collagenase digestion technique and transplanted into the splenic parenchyma. The recipients were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: group A (control group) had no immunosuppression; group B received cyclosporine (CsA) (5 mg/kg); group C receivedmycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (20 mg/kg). The animalswere killed on the 12th d. Blood and grafted tissues were obtained for laboratory and histological assessment. RESULTS: Median allograft survival was significantly higher in the two therapy groups than that in the controls (10 and 12 d for CsA and MMF respectively vs 0 d for the control group, P<0.01). No difference in allograft survival between the CsA and MMF groups was found. However,MMF had less renal and hepatic toxicity and allowed weight gain.CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with MMF for immunosu ppression was safe in an experimental model of islet allotransplantation and was equally effective with cyclosporine, with less toxicity. AIM: To develop an experimental model of islet allotran-splantation in diabetic rats and to determine the positive or adverse effects of MMF as a single agent. METHODS: Thirty-six male Wistar rats and 18 male Lewis rats were used as recipients and donors respectively. Diabetes was induced by the use of streptozotocin (60 mg/kg) intraperitoneally. Unpurified islets were isolated using the collagenase digestion technique and transplanted into the splenic parenchyma. The recipients were randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: group A (control group) had no immunosuppression; group B received cyclosporine (CsA) (5 mg/kg); group C received mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (20 mg/kg). The animals were killed on the 12^(th) d. Blood and grafted tissues were obtained for laboratory and histological assessment. RESULTS: Median allograft survival was significantly higher in the two therapy groups than that in the controls (10 and 12 d for CsA and MMF respectively vs 0 d for the control group, P<0.01). No difference in allograft survival between the CsA and MMF groups was found. However, MMF had less renal and hepatic toxicity and allowed weight gain. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with MMF for immunosuppression was safe in an experimental model of islet allotransplantation and was equally effective with cyclosporine, with less toxicity.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2005年第18期2733-2738,共6页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
基金 Supported by the Special Research Fund, Account Code: 4280, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece
关键词 DIABETES Islet transplantation Rats Mycophenolate mofetil CYCLOSPORINE 麦考酚酸吗乙酯 药物治疗 器官移植 糖尿病 小鼠 动物实验
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1Robertson RP.Islet Transplantation as a Treatment for Diabetes-A Work in Progress.N Engl J Med 2004;350;694-705.
  • 2Ballinger WF,Lacy PE.Transpantation of intact Pancreatic islets in rats.Surgery 1972;72;175-186.
  • 3Reckard CR,Ziegler MM,Barker CF.Physiological and immunological consequences of transplanting isolated pancreatic islets.Surgery,1773;74;91-99.
  • 4Thomas DR,Fox M,Grieve AA.Isolation of islets of Langerhans for transplantation.Nature,1973;242;258-260.
  • 5Alejandro R,Lehmann R,Riccordi C,Kenyon NS,Angelico MC,Burke G,Esquenazi V,Nery J,Betancourt AE,Kong SS,Miller j,Mintz DH.Long-term function (6 years) of islet allografts in type 1 diabetes.Diabetes,1997;46;1983-1989.
  • 6Oberholzer J,Triponez F,Mage R,Andereggen E,Buhler L,Cretin N,Fournier B,Goumaz C,Lou J,Philippe J,Morel P.Human islet transplantation:lessons From 13 autologous and 13 allogeneic transplantation.Transplantation.2000;69;1115-1123.
  • 7Shapiro AM,Lakey JR,Ryan EA,Korbutt GS,Toth E,Warnock GL,Kneteman NM,Rajotte RV.Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen.N Engl J Med 2000;343;230-238.
  • 8Ryan EA,Lakey JR,Rajotte RV,Korbutt GS,Kin T,Imes S,Rabinovitch A,Elliott JF,Bigam D,Kneteman NM,Warnock GL,Larsen I,Shapiro AM,Clinisal outcomes and insulin secretion after islet transplantation with the Edmonton Protocol.Diabetes,2001;50;710-719.
  • 9Hirshberg B,Rother KI,Digon BJ 3rd,Lee J,Gaglia JL,Hines K,Read EJ,Chang R,Wood BJ.Harlan DM,Benefits and risks of solitary islet transplantation for Type 1 diabetes using steroilsparing immunosuppression.Diabetes Care 2003;26;3288-3292.
  • 10Titus TH,Badet L,Gray DWR.Islet cell transplantation for insulin-dependant diabetes mellitus:perspectives from thd present and prospects for the futurd.Available from:http;//www-ermm.cbcu.cam.ac.ac uk//00001861h.htm.

同被引文献21

引证文献7

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部