1Crawley M. The comparative ecology of transgenic and conventional crops[ C]//Casper R, Landsmann J. Int syrup biosafety results of field teats of genetically modified plants and microorganisms. 2nd.Braunsweig, 1992:43 -52.
2Primaek RB, Miao SL. Dispersal can limit local plant distribution [J]. Conservation Biology, 1992,6(4) :513 - 519.
3Ruth Brauner,Beatrix Tappeser. "Development of environment indicators for monitoring of genetically modified plants"sunmmry of a research and development project by commission of the Federal Environmental Agency[Z]. Berlin SBSTTA 7 Montreal,2001:12 - 16.
4Traynor PL , Westwood JH. Ecological effects of pest resistance genes in managed ecosystems ( proceedings of a workshop, organized by Information Systems for Biotechnology) [ Z ]. Bethesda,Maryland, January 31-February 3,1999.
5Hoogendoom M, Heimpel GE. PCR-based gut content analysis of insect predators: using ribosomal ITS - 1 fragments from prey to estmate predation frequency[J]. Molecular Ecology,2001,10:2059- 2067.
6Sanglitz C, Bartsch D,Poid M. Monitoring gene flow from tmnsgenic sugar beet using cytoplasmic male-sterile bait plants[J]. Molecular Ecolngy,2000,9(12) :2035 -2040.
7Thomas R,Andersen MB. The risk of crop transgene spread[J].Nature, 1996,380(7 ) :31.
8Moye, CL,Lilley JM,Casais CA,et al. Barriers to gene flow from oilseed rape ( Brassica napus ) into populations of Sinapis arvensis[J]. Molecular Ecology,2002,11 ( 1 ) :103 -112.
9Kjellsson G,Simonsen V.Methods for risk assessment of transgenic plants competition,establishment and ecosystem effects[M].Basel,Switzerland:Birkhauser Verlag,1994.
10Government of Canada, Canadian Food Inspection Agency. Assessment criteria for determining environmental sdety of plants with novel traits[R]. September 15,2000.
