摘要
《文选》将司马相如的《天子游猎赋》分为《子虚赋》、《上林赋》 ,一直沿用到现在。这使后人错误地把《文选》中分出的《子虚赋》当作游梁时所作。本文主要从司马相如本人以及《文选》分出《子虚赋》入手 ,与枚乘的《七发》进行比较 ,认为《文选》所分出的《子虚赋》只能作于武帝时。而将本来是一个整体的《天子游猎赋》分为两篇是不科学的 ,主张恢复《史记》《汉书》里面的称呼———《天子游猎赋》。
Sima Xiang-ru's Tian Zi You Lie Fu was divided by Wen Xuan into Zi Xu Fu and Shang Ling Fu. And this, was continued to use till now, which always made later generations have wrong understanding, that they thought Zi Xu Fu, taken from Wen Xuan, was written in the period of his visiting Liang. Starting from Sima Xiang-ru himself and Zi Xu Fu that divide from Wen Xuan, and comparing with Mei Cheng's Qi Fa, this article thinks that Zi Xu Fu, divided from Wen Xuan, was written just in the period of Emperor Wu. It is unscientific to divide Tian Zi You Lie Fu into two parts which originally viewed as a whole. So the author advocates to resume the title of the Tian Zi You Lie Fu which was called in Shi Ji and Han Shu.
出处
《中国文学研究》
北大核心
2003年第1期26-30,共5页
Research of Chinese Literature
