期刊文献+

立体绩效评估体系的构建 被引量:5

The Construction of Solid Performance Appraisal System
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 依据人力资源中绩效评估的原则 ,将外部人力资源管理绩效评估专家引入评估主体 ,分析绩效评估的意义 ,重构并完善了评估指标体系———素质绩效、过程绩效、结果绩效、环境绩效四部分。采用立体绩效指标体系实现了评估主体和指标体系的改进 ,满足了评估结果客观性、公正性。 According to purpose and principle of performance appraisal in human resource,Performance appraisal subjects are added from outer experts of human resource performance appraisal and reconstruct and perfect the index system with including diathesis performance,process performance,result performance,environment performance.The solid performance appraisal system fulfils requirement of performance appraisal in objectivity,justness,science with the improvement from appraisal subjects and index system.
作者 李永壮 赵涛
出处 《科学管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2004年第5期105-107,共3页 Scientific Management Research
基金 国家软科学研究计划项目 ( 2 0 0 3DGQ2B138)
关键词 立体绩效评估 评估主体 评估指标 solid performance appraisal appraising subject appraising index
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1蔡永红,林崇德.绩效评估研究的现状及其反思[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2001(4):119-126. 被引量:175
  • 2张保国.360度绩效评估的实施与思考[J].中国人力资源开发,2002,19(6):42-45. 被引量:18
  • 3Ferris, G. R. & Judeg. T. A' Personnel human resource management: Apolitical influence perspective' [ J J. Journal of management, 1991 (17) : 1 - 42.
  • 4Campbell, J. P. McCloy. R. A, Oppler, S. H. & Sager, C. E.A theory of performance In N. Schmitt&W. C. Borman(Eds.), Personnel Selection in Organization[ MJ. San Francisco: Jossey - Bass, 1993 : 35 - 70.
  • 5Deming, W. E. out of the crisis[Z]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Initiative for Advanced Engineering Study, 1986.

二级参考文献23

  • 1Bernardin,H. J. ,Hangan,C. M. ,Kane,J. S. & Villanova,P. ,In Performance Appraisal:State of the Art in Practice ,Simither ,J. W. editor ,San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1998.
  • 2Cardy, R. L. , & Dobbins, G. H. , Performance appraisal: Alternative perspectives, Cincinnati, OH: SouthWestern Publishing Co. ,1994.
  • 3Bernardin,H. J. , ‘Behavioral expectation scales versus summated scales:A fairer comparison' ,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977 (62): 422- 427.
  • 4Landy ,F. J. & Farr ,J. L. , ‘Performance ratings' ,Psychological Bulletin, 1980 (87): 72 - 107.
  • 5Pulakos,E. D. , ‘The development of training programs to increased accuracy in different rating tasks',Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1986 (38): 76 - 91.
  • 6De Nisi,A. S. ,Cafferty,T. P. & Meglino ,B. M. , ‘A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process :A model and research propositions' ,Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1984 (33): 360- 396.
  • 7Zajonc, R. B. , ‘Feeling and thinking: Perferences need no inferences', American Psychologist, 1980 (35):151-175.
  • 8Wayne, S. J. & Ferris, G. R. , ‘Influence tactics ,affect ,and exchange quality in supervisor- subordinate interactions' ,Journal of Applied Psychology, 1990(75): 487- 499.
  • 9Borman, W. C. , White, L. A. & Dorsey, D. W. , ‘Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonalfactors on supervisor and peer performance ratings' ,Journal of Applied Psycholgoy, 1995 (80): 168- 177.
  • 10Ferris ,G. R. & Judeg, T. A. , ‘Personnel/human resources management: A political influence perspective',Journal of management, 1991 (17): 1 - 42.

共引文献189

同被引文献38

引证文献5

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部