期刊文献+

正电子发射断层显像中感兴趣区选取及标准摄取值分界点的优化 被引量:5

Optimization of drawing ROI and SUV diagnostic cut-off on PET image
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探讨PET图像中勾画感兴趣区 (ROI)的最佳方法及标准摄取值 (SUV)最佳诊断分界点。方法 以PETFDG 12 6例肺部肿瘤图像为例说明 ,由SUVmax的百分比 ( 5 0 %~ 10 0 % )为等高线值勾画ROI ,得各SUV均值 ;由受试者工作特性 (ROC)曲线分析确定ROI最佳画法 ;由准确率最大值、Youden’s指数最大值及敏感性与特异性交点确定分界点。结果 ①最优ROI :70 %等高线所画ROI的SUV具有最大ROC曲线下面积。其 3个典型SUV分界点值分别为 :2 .0 75、2 .82 5、2 .919。② 3个典型分界点的准确率、Youden’s指数和阳性概率比 /阴性概率比均在 70 %等高线出现较大值。结论 提出一套客观画取ROI、确定最佳等高线值、及最佳分界点的方法 。 Objective To investigate the optimum method to draw ROI and the optimum diagnostic cut-off on PET images. Methods PET FDG images of 126 patients with lung tumors (benign 39, malignant 87) were selected. For each tumor six ROIs were drawn with contour line at 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 100% of the maximum SUV, and the average SUVs were calculated. According to the results of ROC analysis, the optimum method of drawing ROI was determined. Three typical diagnostic SUV cut-off points were determined based on the maximum accuracy, the maximum Youden's index and the intersection of sensitivity and specificity. Results ①The area under the ROC curve was maximum at the SUV in the ROI drawn with contour line at 70% of the maximum SUV, and the three typical cut-off SUVs were 2.075, 2.825, 2.919, respectively. ②Among the six ROIs with contour line, the accuracy, Youden's index and the ratio of the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) to the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) at three typical SUVs cut-off had maximum values at the ROI drawn with contour line at 70%. Conclusion The optimum methods of drawing ROI impersonally and determining optimum diagnostic cut-off are proposed, which can be used in quantitative analysis and clinical diagnosis with PET images.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 2004年第6期935-937,共3页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 全军医药卫生科研基金资助项目 (0 1MA1 2 0 )
关键词 PET图像 感兴趣区 标准摄取值 诊断分界点 优化 PET images Region of interest Standard uptake value Cut-off Optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[1]Sasaki M, Kuwabara Y, Yoshida T, et al. Comparison of METPET and FDG-PET for differentiation between benign lesions and malignant tumors of the lung [J]. Ann Nucl Med, 2001, 15 (5):425-431.
  • 2[2]Zhang H, Tian M, Oriuchi N, et al. 11C-choline PET for the detection of bone and soft tissue tumours in comparison with FDG PET[J]. Nucl Med Commun, 2003, 24(3):273-279.
  • 3[3]Huang SC. Anatomy of SUV[J]. Nucl Med Biol, 2000, 27 (7):643-646.
  • 4[4]Keyes JW Jr. SUV: standard uptake or silly useless value[J] ? J Nucl Med, 1995, 36(10) :1836-1839.
  • 5[5]Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve[J]. Radiology, 1982, 143(1): 29-36.
  • 6[6]Henderson AR. Assessing test accuracy and its clinical consequences: a primer for receiver operating characteristic curve analysis[J]. Ann Clin Biochem, 1993, 30(6) :521-539.
  • 7[9]Hubner KF, Buonocore E, Gould HR, et al. Differentiating benign from malignant lung lesions using "quantitative" parameters of FDG PET images[J]. Clin Nucl Med, 1996, 21(12) :941-949.
  • 8[10]Vansteenkiste JF, Stroobants SG, Dupont PJ, et al. Prognostic importance of the standardized uptake value on (18)F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography scan in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of 125 cases[J]. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17(10) :3201-3206.

同被引文献55

  • 1耿建华,陈英茂,陈盛祖,田嘉禾,何义杰,乔士珍.符合线路显像与PET显像中SUV的比较研究[J].中华核医学杂志,2004,24(5):308-309. 被引量:11
  • 2付占立,王荣福.FDG PET显像的定量及半定量分析[J].中华核医学杂志,2004,24(5):313-317. 被引量:11
  • 3耿建华,陈英茂.正电子图像的定量分析在临床肿瘤学中的应用[J].国外医学(放射医学核医学分册),2005,29(1):6-9. 被引量:4
  • 4俞建华,王荣福.正电子发射断层代谢显像标准摄取值及定量分析的问题与对策[J].中国医学影像技术,2005,21(5):791-794. 被引量:12
  • 5Keyes JW. SUV: Standard uptake value or silly useless value[J] J Nucl Med,1995,36(10):1836-1839.
  • 6Thie JA. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage[J].J Nucl Med,2004,45(9):1431-1434.
  • 7Minn H, Joensuu H, Ahonen A, et al. Fluorodeoxyglucose imaging: a method to assess the proliferative activity of human cancer in vivo: comparison with DNA flow cytometry in head and neck tumors[J].Cancer,1988,61(9):1776-1781.
  • 8Hamberg LM, Hunter GJ, Alpert NM, et al. The dose uptake ratio as an index of glucose metabolism: useful parameter or over simplification[J]? J Nucl Med,1994,35(8):1308-1312.
  • 9Strauss LG, Clorius JH, Schlag P, et al. Recurrence of colorectal tumors: PET evaluation[J].Radiology,1989,170(2):329-332.
  • 10Langen KJ, Braun U, Rota-Kops E, et al. The influence of plasma glucose levels on fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in bronchial carcinomas[J].J Nucl Med,1993,34(2):355-359.

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部