期刊文献+

社区护理干预对老年糖尿病患者治疗效果影响的Meta分析 被引量:14

Meta-analysis of curative effect of community nursing intervension for diabetes mellitus in olders
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价社区护理干预对老年糖尿病治疗效果的影响。方法计算机检索PubMed、EMbase中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、万方数据库和中国期刊全文数据库,纳入老年糖尿病社区护理干预的随机对照实验,由2人独立进行数据提取和文献评价。采用RevMan5.0软件进行分析。结果共纳入6个RCT。Meta分析结果显示在血糖控制率[RR=4.07,95%CI(3.08,5.38),P<0.00001]、疾病知识掌握情况[RR=4.43,95%CI(3.26,6.03),P<0.00001]、遵医嘱率[RR=1.72,95%CI(1.31,2.24),P<0.0001]方面均具有统计学意义。结论 Meta分析显示社区护理干预对老年糖尿病的疗效优于传统护理方法。 Objective To evaluate the curative effect of community nursing intervension for diabetes mellitus in olders by using the Meta-analysis. Methods The data bases of PubMed、EMbase,CBM,Wanfang Data,CNKI were searched. Into the old age community diabetes care intervention randomized controlled experiment by 2 independent data extraction and literature evaluation. Using RevMan5.0 software for analyzing. Results In 6 RCT Meta-analysis revealed in glycemic control rate[RR=4.07,95%CI(3.08,5.38),P<0.00001], disease knowledge[RR=4.43,95%CI(3.26,6.03),P<0.00001],compliance rate[RR=1.72,95%CI(1.31,2.24),P<0.0001] were statistical significance. Conclusion Meta analysis indicated that community nursing intervention on elderly diabetes is more effective than the traditional nursing method.
作者 雷良蓉
出处 《中国现代医药杂志》 2012年第4期57-59,共3页 Modern Medicine Journal of China
关键词 社区护理 老年 META分析 Community nursing Older Meta analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献39

共引文献505

同被引文献111

  • 1成晨.护理干预对老年糖尿病患者心理的影响[J].求医问药(下半月),2013(7):203-203. 被引量:1
  • 2吴泰相,刘关键,李静.影响系统评价质量的主要因素浅析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2005,5(1):51-58. 被引量:50
  • 3潘长玉,金文胜.2型糖尿病流行病学[J].中华内分泌代谢杂志,2005,21(5). 被引量:168
  • 4席冠华,王云霞,张辛,谢芳.社区护理干预对老年糖尿病患者生活质量的影响[J].护理学报,2006,13(4):9-10. 被引量:42
  • 5Mellinqer E, McCanless L. Evidenccbased nursing practice in the perioperative setting: a magnet journey to eliminate sa- cred cows[J].AORN J, 2010,92 (5) : 572-578.
  • 6Salmos J, Gerbi M E, Braz R, et al. Methodological qua- lity of systematic reviews analyzing the use of laser thera- py in restorative dentistry[J]. Lasers Med Sci, 2010,25 (1) :127-136.
  • 7Davision C M, Sochan A, Pretorius R. Are the Cochrane collaboration systematic reviews relevant resources for evidence-based nursing internationally [J].Int J Nurs Stud,2010,47(7) :795-797.
  • 8Coster S, Norman I. Cochrane reviews of education and self-management interventions to guide nursing practice:a review[J]. Int J Nurs Stud, 2009,46 (4) : 508-528.
  • 9Shea B J, Hamel C, Wells G A, et al. AMSTAR is a re- liable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodo- logical quality of systematic reviews[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2009,62 (10) : 1013-1020.
  • 10Yang W, Lu J, Weng J,el al. Prevalence of diabetes among men and womenin China[J]. N Engl J Med,2010,362(12) ; 1090-1101.

引证文献14

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部