摘要
先秦时期,"家"有两种含义,"六家"、"百家"之"家",有不同涵义。而"九流"则是刘向、刘歆父子借用司马氏父子的成果,为皇家图书编目录时所使用的目录名称。后人因为对于"九流"的沿用,以及误读、推重向歆父子对于学术源流的探讨,建构了一个从王官之学到九流再到诸子的学术思想演进图,将"九流"视为学术思想发展中的历史事实,影响了后人对于先秦学术思想的正确看法,抹杀了"百家"。这其中,有不同时代的知识、思潮和"理性",来强化、凸显这个虚幻的历史事实,后人反而不再质疑"九流"的来历。
During the Pre-Qin Period,the Jia of learning had two meanings.The Liujia was named after accordant ideas and the jiuliu was a name in a catalogue at first.However,thinking too much of the headstream of thoughts,later generations set up a developing route that it came from officials,went to Jiuliu,then to Zhuzi.There were various knowledge,trends of thoughts and reasons in different periods made them take it for granted that the Jiuliu was a historical fact,not oppugn the history of Jiuliu,which affected their understanding to the thoughts of Pre-Qin Period and wrote off the Baijia.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2004年第4期81-87,共7页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
关键词
百家
六家
九流
思想史
Baijia
Liujia
Jiuliu
Intellectual history
