期刊文献+

诉讼时效中断之举证责任探讨 被引量:1

Discussion on Responsibility of Proof of Limitation Discontinuity
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 诉讼时效中断之举证责任的分担应依据当事人的诉求和抗辩,在当事人进行适当的分配,实现举证责任的合理转移。权利人应当对其所主张诉讼请求依据的事实进行举证,义务人则应当对其抗辩的诉讼时效所依据的事实进行举证。权利人和义务人就诉讼时效提出抗辩和再抗辩,则应当分别对其抗辩和再抗辩予以举证。义务人和权利人对诉讼时效的抗辩和再抗辩都无法举证和充分举证时,应作出有利于权利人的认定。 Limitation discontinuity of the shared responsibility of proof should be based on the demands and the defense of the litigants,the appropriate distribution of the litigants to achieve a reasonable transfer of the responsibility of proof.People with rights should prove their claims based on facts,people with obligations should prove the facts its defense.People with rights and obligations propose the defense and defense again of the limitation,they should be prove defense and defense again.When people with rights and obligations cannot prove and prove fully,the benefit should be made to the people with rights.
作者 李国波
出处 《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》 2010年第4期-,共3页 Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词 诉讼时效 中断 举证责任 举证分担 Limitation Discontinuity Responsibility of proof Proof sharing
  • 相关文献

同被引文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部