期刊文献+

改良全盆底重建手术治疗联合康复护理对女性盆腔器官脱垂的改善效果观察 被引量:1

在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探究改良全盆底重建手术治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的临床护理及效果.方法将2017年6月—2019年6月在该院接受治疗的60例女性盆腔器官脱垂患者作为研究对象,并给予随机分组,对照组30例,给予常规护理;观察组30例,在对照组基础上给予围手术期护理干预,对两组患者术后生活质量评分及并发症发生情况进行综合评价.结果观察组患者治疗后的生理功能、躯体功能、情感职能等生活质量评分显著优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),有统计学意义;且观察组治疗后有2例患者出现并发症,占6.6%,显著低于对照组的23.2%,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论采用改良全盆底重建手术治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂并辅之以有效临床护理,能够提升患者术后生活质量,提升护理满意度,值得推广应用.
作者 张芳 闫丽丽
出处 《反射疗法与康复医学》 2020年第7期137-138,共2页 Reflexology And Rehabilitation Medicine
作者简介 张芳(1971-),女,山东济南人,本科,主管护师,研究方向:妇幼保健。
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献66

  • 1Elliott CS, Rhoads KF, Comiter CV, et al. Improving the accuracy of prolapse and incontinence procedure epidemiology by utilizing both inpatient and outpatient data [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2013, 24(11):1939-1946. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-013-2115-z.
  • 2Maher CM, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updated summary version Cochrane review[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2011, 22(11): 1445-1457. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-011-1542-9.
  • 3Persu C, Chapple CR, Cauni V, et al. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification System (POP-Q)-a new era in pelvic prolapse staging[J]. J Med Life, 2011, 4(1):75-81.
  • 4Saul LL, Kurtzman JT, Hagemann C, et al. Is transabdominal sonography of the cervix after voiding a reliable method of cervical length assessment?[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(9): 1305-1311.
  • 5Hyakutake MT, Cundiff GW, Geoffrion R. Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2014, 25(6):851-854. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-013-2258-9.
  • 6Abdelmonem AM. Vaginal length and incidence of dyspareunia after total abdominal versus vaginal hysterectomy [J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2010, 151(2):190-192. DOI: 10.10! 6/j.ejogrb.2010.03.031.
  • 7Costantini S, Mistrangelo E, Francioso R, et al. Vaginal versus transabdominal hysterectomy: is mode of hysterectomy to influence pelvic statics or is pelvic statics to influence mode of hysterectomy?[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2005, 84(4): 376-379.
  • 8de Boer TA, Milani AL, Kluivers KB, et al. The effectiveness of surgical correction of uterine prolapse: cervical amputation with uterosacral ligament plication (modified Manchester)versus vaginal hysterectomy with high uterosacral ligament plication[J]. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct, 2009, 20 (11 ): 1313-1319. DOI: 10.1007/s00192-009-0945-3.
  • 9Huang LY, Chu LC, Chiang H J, et al. Medium-term comparison of uterus preservation versus hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse treatment with Prolift mesh[J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2015, 26(7):1013-1020. DOI: 10.1007/ s00192-015-2630-z.
  • 10Khan ZA, Thomas L, Emery SJ. Outcomes and complications of trans-vaginal mesh repair using the Prolift TM kit for pelvic organ prolapse at 4 years median follow-up in a tertiary referral centre[J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014, 290(6): 1151-1157. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-014-3316-3.

共引文献174

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部