摘要
联合国安理会是联合国唯一的执行机关,承担着维护世界和平的主要责任,因此安理会作出的决议对国际社会将产生约束力。但是安理会决议的国际法性质和地位始终存在较大的争议,对于安理会决议是否具有造法性质,学界尚未达成统一的意见。为厘清安理会决议的性质,应当从国际法渊源的角度确定决议的效力来源和安理会决议与国际法渊源的关系,并结合具体内容分析安理会决议的性质和地位。安理会决议的权力来源于《联合国宪章》与主权国家的授权,作为执行机构,安理会决议应被认定为执行的办法而非法律,其对于国际法体系而言只是确定习惯国际法规则存在的证据而非创设规则的文件。
The United Nations Security Council(Security Council for Short)is the only executive organ of the United Nations,undertaking the main responsibility of maintaining world peace,so the resolutions made by the security council have binding force on the international community.However,the nature and status of Security Council resolutions in international law have always been a great dispute.The academic community has not reached consensus on whether Security Council resolutions are lawmaking.In order to clarify the nature of Security Council resolutions,it is necessary to determine the source of the effectiveness of Security Council resolutions and the relationship between Security Council resolutions and sources of international law from the perspective of sources of international law,and analyze the nature and status of Security Council resolutions based on their specific contents.The power of making Security Council resolutions is derived from the Charter of the United Nations and the authorization of sovereign States.Security Council resolutions should be regarded as the means of implementation rather than the law itself,which is only the proof of the existence of the rules of customary international law rather than the document establishing international law rules.
出处
《国际关系与国际法学刊》
2020年第1期113-126,共14页
Journal of International Relations and International Law
关键词
安理会决议
国际法渊源
造法性决议
习惯国际法识别
Security Council Resolution
Sources of International Law
Law-Making Resolution
Recognition of Customary International Law
作者简介
凌冰尧,华东政法大学国际法学院博士研究生,研究方向:国际法学。
