摘要
关于被追诉人本人是否享有阅卷权的问题,应然和实然两个层面均存在争议,迄今仍难以达成一致。在认罪认罚从宽制度改革背景下,赋予认罪认罚的被追诉人阅卷权具有其内在的必要性,这既是保证认罪认罚"自愿性"的基础,同时也是因为值班律师制度无法满足现实需求。认罪认罚案件中赋予被追诉人阅卷权,存在观念、规范和实践层面的障碍,需要通过完善制度去消解这些障碍。在阅卷权的实现机制上,需要科学设定阅卷时间和范围,在实施规则上合理安排阅卷地点和方式,并且配套程序性制裁作为救济方式。
There is a controversy about the question that the accused whether has the right of reading the case files both the ideal institution and the actual institution.Under the background of reforming the system of leniency on admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment,the right of reading the case files should be given to the accused,which is not only the basis of admission of guilty and acceptance of punishment,but also because the duty lawyer system can not meet the actual needs.There are existential,normative and practical barriers if we give the right of reading the case files to the accused in the case of guilty plea and accepting punishment,so it is necessary to perfect the system for resolving these obstacles.In the construction of the right of reading the case files,it is necessary to set the time and scope of the reading scientifically,arrange the location and method of reading the case files reasonably on the operation rules,and apply the procedural sanction as the remedies.
作者
何静
孙滢滢
HE Jing;SUN Yingying(School of law,Nanjing Tech University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 211816)
出处
《长白学刊》
北大核心
2020年第2期88-94,共7页
Changbai Journal
基金
国家社科基金项目“新时代行政公益诉讼中的检察职能研究”(18BFX053)
江苏省法学会法学研究课题“认罪认罚从宽视角下的《监察法》实施问题研究”(SFH2019D05)。
关键词
认罪
认罚
被追诉人
阅卷权
Admission of Guilt
Acceptance of Punishment
The Accused
The Right of Reading the Case Files
作者简介
何静(1979-),男,法学博士,南京工业大学法学院副教授;孙滢滢(1994-),女,南京工业大学法学院硕士研究生。
