摘要
根据条约解释的习惯国际法,对涉案条约的必要解释,以澄清相关条约义务,是国际裁判机构解决条约适用引起争端的关键。此类条约解释包含的国际法原理、原则及其阐释的"判理稳定性",体现了条约适用和解释的可预期性。条约解释的"判理稳定性"不仅是理论问题,而且更是和平解决国际争端实践中的重大敏感问题。本文基于已有研究,旨在跟踪研究分析国际法院和世界贸易组织争端解决机构晚近案例中的条约解释"判理稳定性",首先阐明有关概念和研究意义,然后重点分析这两个全球最有影响的国际裁判机构的相关实践,由此得到加深理解该问题和有助于我们应对国际争端解决的一些启示。
It is essential for the international adjudicates to settle disputes arising from the application of treaties by the necessary interpretation of the relevant treaties for the clarification of obligations in accordance with the customary international law of treaty interpretation.Such interpretations include the principles of international laws and the resulted"jurisprudence constante",which reflects the predictability of treaty application and interpretation.The"jurisprudence constante"of treaty interpretation is not only a theoretical issue,but also very significant and sensitive in the practices of the peaceful settlement of international disputes.This article is based on the existing researches to pursue further study on the"jurisprudence constante"of the recent ICJ and WTO cases.It begins with the illumination of the relevant concepts and the significance of the study,and then,focuses on the recent cases of the two most prestigous international adjudicates,finalizes a few indications for more understandings of the addressed issues and helps to prepare the settlement of international disputes.
出处
《荆楚法学》
2021年第2期106-120,共15页
Jingchu Law Review
作者简介
张乃根,复旦大学法学院教授
