摘要
最新的立法和司法动态对违规披露、不披露重要信息罪罪名适用提供了新的思路。然而,一方面“以罚代刑”问题囤积已久,另一方面当前趋严的刑事政策似乎又试图将本罪适用引入另一个极端。应当通过厘清行政违法与刑事违法的边界,明确本罪合理的适用空间。质的区分说应成为本罪的行刑界分方式,进而将还原成金融信用利益的信息披露制度这一法益作为本罪行刑界分的具体标准,实现违规信息披露行为入罪出罪双向合理化。
The latest legislative and judicial developments have provided new ideas on the application of the crime of false disclosure of important information.However,on the one hand,the problem of“penalties instead of punishment”has been accumulating for a long time,and on the other hand,the current strict criminal policy seems to try to lead the application of this offence to the other extreme.By clarifying the boundary between administrative and criminal offence,a reasonable scope for the application of this offence should be clarified.The qualitative distinction should be the way to define the offence,and the legal benefit of the information disclosure system,which is reduced to financial credit interests,should be the specific criterion for the the crime of false disclosure of important information,so as to rationalize the two-way criminalization of information disclosure violations.
作者
梅阳
Mei Yang(China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2022年第4期52-58,共7页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
基金
中国法学会2022年度部级法学研究一般委托课题“侵犯商业秘密罪保护法益的秩序化界定及其教义学展开”[CLS(2022)WT18]的阶段性成果
关键词
违规披露
不披露重要信息罪
信息披露
区分说
金融信用利益
disclosure of violation
crime of false disclosure of important information
disclosure of important information
distinction
financial credit interest
作者简介
梅阳(1998—),男,河南郑州人,中国政法大学刑事司法学院2020级硕士研究生。
