摘要
本文从标识性概念演进角度入手,回溯了中国式现代化过程中的宏观经济管理理论创新,通过分析概念与现实之间的双重映射关系和词频定量考察,将这一历程分为三期(“综合平衡-宏观调控-宏观经济治理”),并提出了一个概念成长与更替的解释性理论框架:长期看,标识性概念的演进是学术范式与知识体系变革的标志和经济体制改革的结果,其根本动因是时代主题转变;短期看,单个概念在其生命周期内为解释和应对经济波动而逐渐成长,经历“准备-发展-成熟”三阶段演化。标识性概念的演进反映了宏观经济管理理论的创新,这些理论探索围绕中国问题中国实践,吸收承纳传统及外来学术成果又结合国情与时代特征加以创造性解读,在动态发展中不断自我超越。完善宏观经济治理对于推进中国式现代化具有重要意义,宏观经济治理理论和实践的未来发展创新,必须同中国具体实际和中华优秀传统文化相结合。
China has made rich and unique achievements in macroeconomic theory and policy since 1949.This paper reviews the evolution of core concepts and theoretical innovation of macroeconomic management in the process of China's modernization,and examines the dual mapping relationship between core concepts and reality,using the linguistic categories of“signifier”and“signified”.This historical evolution and innovation process can be divided into three periods:“Zong He Ping Heng”(Comprehensive Balance),“Hong Guan Tiao Kong”(Macroeconomic Control)and“Hong Guan Jing Ji Zhi Li”(Macroeconomic Governance).“Comprehensive balance”is a symbolic concept in the era of planned economy mostly before 1979.It advocated a holistic and pragmatic approach to promote economic growth in a planned and proportional way,by focusing on three major balances of finance,credit and materials.In the period of socialist market economy exploration,the core concept gradually shifted from“comprehensive balance”to“macroeconomic control”,which emphasized the use of diversified means such as economic policy,law and administrative regulation to manage the economy indirectly under market conditions.Entering the new era of Chinese socialism,under the framework of“macroeconomic governance”,China has launched the innovation and upgrading of macro-control.The division of periods mentioned above is supported by quantitative analysis based on documentary statistics,including official policy documents and journal articles.This paper analyzes the cause of the evolution of core concepts,puts forward an interpretative theoretical framework for the growth and revolution of concepts,and argues that in the long run,the evolution of core concepts is the symbol of the transformation of academic paradigms and knowledge systems and the result of economic system reform,and its fundamental cause is the change of the theme of the times.In the short term,a single core concept gradually grows in response to economic fluctuations,and undergoes three stages of evolution in its life cycle,namely,“preparation-development-maturity”.This paper also gives a comparative study on the innovation of core concepts in an international perspective.The evolution of core concepts reflects the innovation of macroeconomic management theory driven by the real needs of Chinese people.These theoretical explorations center on China's problems and practices,absorb traditional and foreign academic achievements,and creatively interpret them in combination with national conditions and the characteristics of the times,thus constantly evolving in dynamic development and promoting the process of Chinese path to modernization.Compared with the USSR model that emphasized to achieve rigid long-term goals by focusing on key commodities,the“comprehensive balance”of China emphasized the variability and dynamic adjustment of the planned objectives,as well as the overall balance of economic production and the autonomy and flexibility of grass-roots level in the implementation,and left room for market operation within the theoretical framework.Macroeconomic policy research and practice in the West focused on demand-side fluctuations,depended overly on the single pillar role of monetary policy,and emphasized laissez-faire while ignoring the wealth gap problem.In contrast,China's“macroeconomic control”emphasized the guiding role of national medium and long-term scheme,and the policy toolbox was more abundant,which could balance the supply side and the demand side more effectively,and paid more attention to people's livelihood.“Macroeconomic governance”is an upgraded concept in the new era of socialism with Chinese characteristics.It emphasizes solving long-term and deep-seated problems through institutional construction,promoting high-quality development,and facilitating the effective connection between cross-cyclical policy design and counter-cyclical adjustment.Improving macroeconomic governance is of great significance for promoting the Chinese path to modernization.The future development and innovation of macroeconomic governance theory and practice must be combined with China's specific reality and the excellent traditional Chinese culture.
作者
程霖
岳翔宇
夏艳秋
CHENG Lin;YUE Xiangyu;XIA Yanqiu(Institute for the Development of Chinese Economic Thought,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics;School of Economics,Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)
出处
《经济研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2023年第1期18-37,共20页
Economic Research Journal
基金
国家社科基金重大项目“近代以来中国经济学构建的探索与实践研究”(17ZDA034)
上海财经大学创新团队资助项目(2020110932)
上海财经大学经济学院研究生科研创新资助项目(kycx-2020-23)资助
关键词
标识性概念
宏观经济管理
宏观经济治理
习近平经济思想
中国式现代化
Core Concept
Macroeconomic Management
Macroeconomic Governance
Xi Jinping's Economic Thought
Chinese Path to Modernization
作者简介
程霖,上海财经大学经济学院、中国经济思想发展研究院,邮政编码:200433,电子信箱:clin63@mail.shufe.edu.cn;岳翔宇,中国经济思想发展研究院,邮政编码:200433,电子信箱:13917430966@126.com;通讯作者:夏艳秋,上海财经大学经济学院,邮政编码:200433,电子信箱:xyqsummer68@163.com。
