摘要
大英县永佳纸业有限公司诉四川省大英县人民政府不履行行政协议案的争点之一是对无名协议性质的识别。本案提出,行政协议的识别要遵循形式标准和实质标准,这一主张既一般性地揭示了行政协议的识别框架,又指明了各个判断要素的具体判断基准和要素间的关系,为识别行政协议提供了相对确定的方法和标准。但这一识别框架仍然存在有待商榷之处,具体而言,“职责要素”不宜作为识别行政协议的本质要素,而只能作为判断“内容要素”的辅助性要素;“内容要素”是识别行政协议的核心,应当主要通过行政优益权要素进行判断,兼以“目的要素”和“职责要素”进行补强。
The identification of the nature of innominate contract is the argument of the case of Daying.This case argues that the identification of administrative contract should follow the formal standard and substantive standard.It not only reveals the identification framework of administrative contract in a general way,but also points out specific criteria of each element and the relationship between them,providing an established method and standard for the identification of administrative contract.However,there are still some problems in this framework.Specifically,“authority element”should not be regarded as the essential factor of identifying administrative contract,but only as the subsidiary element of judging“content element”.“Content element”is the core element,which should be judged mainly by administrative privilege,and reinforced by“purpose element”and“authority element”.
出处
《贸大法律评论》
2020年第1期194-205,共12页
Uibe Legal Science
关键词
行政协议
识别标准
行政诉讼
行政优益权
法律关系
administrative contract
identification criteria
administrative litigation
administrative privilege
legal relation
作者简介
李幸洁,复旦大学法学院硕士研究生。
