摘要
基于亚里士多德在《形而上学》中关于“第一哲学”的两种定义,后世对于“形而上学”对象问题的讨论便产生了两个不同的向度,即事物的第一因与存在本身。与形而上学问题匹配的是形而上学思维,于是,在形而上学思维的养成过程中,西方哲学逐渐形成了两种不同的探讨形而上学的思想进路,即“对立现象与本体的二分法思维”和“对应存在与存在者的非二分法思维”。中观哲学作为一种形而上学,在完成其对真相的揭露过程中,也有与西方哲学相似的形而上的思维方式,特别是在古代印度,二分法与非二分法思维甚至可以成为区隔不同中观派别的标准和依据。因为思维方式的差异可以直接导致思维结果的显著不同。本文立足中观形而上学思维,以般若空性为考察对象,研究二分法与非二分法思维各自进趣中道实相的路径与方法,同时呈现两种思维方式背后的底层逻辑,以及可能得到的不同结论。
Based on Aristotle’s two definitions of“first philosophy”in Metaphysics,the discussion of the object of“metaphysics”in later generations has produced two different perspectives,namely,the first cause of things and the existence itself.It is metaphysical thinking that matches the metaphysical problem.Therefore,in the process of forming metaphysical thinking,western philosophy has gradually formed two different ways of thinking about metaphysics,namely,“dichotomy thinking of opposite phenomena and ontology”and“non—dichotomy thinking of corresponding existence and existence”.As a kind of metaphysics,the philosophy of Zhong Guan also has a metaphysical way of thinking similar to the western philosophy in the process of disclosing the truth.Especially in ancient India,dichotomy and non—dichotomy thinking can even become the standard and basis to distinguish different Zhong Guan sects.Because the differences in thinking modes can directly lead to significant differences in thinking results,this paper,based on the metaphysical view in Zhong Guan sect,takes Buddhist wisdom of Emptiness as the object of study,studies the paths and methods of dichotomy and non-dichotomy thinking into the reality of the Middle Way,and presents the underlying logic behind the two thinking modes,and even the different conclusions that may be obtained.
作者
智瀚
Zhihan(The China Buddhist Academy of Mt.Putuo)
出处
《普陀学刊》
2023年第2期133-149,340,共18页
关键词
中观
形而上学
二分法
非二分法
显现
大空性
Zhong Guan
Metaphysics
Dichotomy
Non-dichotomy
Emerge
Great Emptiness
