摘要
在我国推进合宪性审查的实践中,“宪法精神”已然成为具有规范性的审查标准。对“宪法精神”规范内涵的确定,需要进行历史维度的考察,解读“八二宪法”的时代精神。“文化大革命”的历史教训,从负面形成了“八二宪法”起草的社会共识。从肖蔚云、许崇德等宪法起草者的记述中可以看出,从修宪基础、宪法指导思想到宪法文本的具体表述和规定,“八二宪法”都贯穿着对“文化大革命”反面经验的总结。“改革开放”作为文革的对立面,也是“八二宪法”的宪法精神之所在,并在历次宪法修改中不断得到确认和充实。在新时代,对“宪法精神”的历史解读,有助于更好地理解和适用宪法,推进宪法的全面贯彻实施。
In the practice of carrying out constitutional review,“Constitutional Spirit”has become a normative standard in constitutional review.The determination of the normative connotation of“Constitutional Spirit”requires the interpretation of the spirit of the times of the 1982 Constitution from historical perspective.While drafting the 1982 Constitution,the historical lessons of the“Cultural Revolution”were related to the formation of the social consensus.From the accounts of the drafters of the constitution such as Weiyun Xiao and Chongde Xu,it can be seen that the 1982 Constitution focuses on the summary of the historical lessons of the“Cultural Revolution”,ranging from the basis of constitutional amendment and the guiding ideology of the constitution to the specific expressions and provisions of the constitutional text.As the opposite of the Cultural Revolution,“reform and opening up”also reflects the“Constitutional Spirit”of the 1982 Constitution,which has been continuously confirmed and improved in previous constitutional amendments.In the new era,a historical interpretation of the“Constitutional Spirit”will help to understand and apply the Constitution,and promote the implementation of the Constitution.
出处
《中国政法大学学报》
CSSCI
2022年第6期60-72,共13页
Journal Of CUPL
关键词
八二宪法
时代精神
改革开放
宪法修改
1982 Constitution
the spirit of the times
reform and opening up
constitutional amendments
作者简介
张翔(1976-),男,甘肃张掖人,法学博士,北京大学法学院教授,研究方向为宪法学;梁芷澄(1997-),男,广西柳州人。北京大学法学院博士研究生。研究方向为宪法学。
