摘要
社会节奏在人类学的研究中一直是特别核心的问题。印欧人基本的社会节奏为整个人类学和社会学理解何为社会提供了重要参照,这一问题成为宗教与世俗的二分,礼物与交换、个体精神与联合精神这些概念的根本来源。人类学者在世界各地寻找到在社会节奏层面上能与印欧人进行对照的社会,他们发现法的二重性是印欧社会的基本特征,在节奏的两端法权产生了变化,并以此为基础衍生出了复杂的概念系统。年鉴学派是人类学中讨论社会节奏成体系的代表,本文以梅因等学者对于日耳曼共同体法权的研究为基础,回顾年鉴学派学者关于社会节奏的民族志材料,希望梳理对于社会节奏的研究与误读。
The social Rhythm has always be the core problem of anthropology.The basic social Rhythm of Indo-European provides important reference for anthropology and sociology to understand what is the society.This problem divides religion and secularity and the basic origin of concepts of gifts and exchange,individual spirits and unite spirits.The scholars of anthropology have found societies all over the world that can be compared with Indo-European on the level of social Rhythm,and they found that the duality of law is the basic feature of IndoEuropean society,the rights of law changed at the two ends of Rhythm,and from which the complex concepts system derived.Annales school of Sociolgy is the representative to discuss the social Rhythm among anthropology.Based on the studies on Germanic community law of Maine and other scholars,the paper looked back on ethnographic materials of scholars of annales school of Sociology,and hopes to comb through the studies and misunderstanding on social Rhythm.
出处
《青海民族研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2021年第2期92-103,共12页
Qinghai Journal of Ethnology
关键词
社会节奏
共同体
法权
法的二重性
Social Rhythm
Community
Lawful Right
Duality of Law
作者简介
刘明月(1994-),女,湖南临湘人,石河子大学政法学院社会学系助教,主要从事人类学经典理论研究。
