摘要
由母国对跨国公司进行监管不仅是国际人权条约的要求,更可在宪法释义学中找到依据。基本权利功能体系为证成母国义务提供了分析框架:请求权关系通过构建母国政府和跨国公司侵权受害人之间的联系而建立;基本权利的客观价值秩序功能也能为母国义务提供依据。本文通过构建"母国—跨国公司侵权受害人"之间基于投资产生的管辖关系,发展出国家保护义务上升为主观权利的新型模式。根据中国宪法,中国作为跨国公司的母国有义务采取措施对总部在其领土的跨国公司进行监管,防止它们在海外侵犯人权。中国政府已采取一定措施落实母国义务,但仍存在不足,需进一步提高与完善。
Not only human rights treaties but also constitutional law requires a home State to regulate overseas investments.Home State obligations could be derived from the functional approach of fundamental rights:an entitlement relationship is established on the basis of the link between an individual victim and a home State;home State obligations could also be based on the fundamental rights as the objective order of values.This article develops a way to turning home State obligations based on the objective order of values into subjective rights by designing a jurisdictional relationship between a home State and a corporate victim.According to the Chinese constitution,the Chinese government should prevent Chinese companies from abusing human rights abroad.The Chinese government has already taken some measures to fulfill home state obligations,whereas some measures could be improved.
出处
《人权研究（辑刊）》
2019年第2期259-287,共29页
Journal of Human Rights
关键词
跨国公司
母国
人权
保护义务
Multinational Corporations
Home State
Human Rights
the Obligation to Protect
作者简介
于亮,天津大学法学院副教授,法学博士。
