摘要
2021年修订的《刑诉法解释》第一百零一条对事故调查报告的证据能力进行了规定。对事故调查报告在刑事诉讼中的证据能力直接进行规范,为其在实践中作为证据使用提供了法律依据,化解了事故调查报告无法适用现行行刑证据转化规定进入刑事诉讼程序的问题。因对事故调查报告证据能力的规定不具体,存在事故调查报告无法归入法定证据种类、事故调查报告各部分是否均具有证据能力、事故调查报告证据能力审查规则模糊等争议问题。为了规范事故调查报告在刑事诉讼中的适用,需要进一步讨论在我国立法框架下,如何突破法定证据种类的限制、明确事故调查报告各部分的证据能力、从相关性、合法性和可靠性等方面完善审查规则。
Article 101 of the Interpretation of the Criminal Procedure Law revised in 2021 stipulates the evidence ability of the accident investigation report.To regulate the evidence ability of accident investigation report in criminal litigation directly provides a legal basis for its use as evidence in practice,and also resolves the problem that accident investigation report cannot apply the current execution evidence conversion regulations into criminal litigation.Due to the lack of specific provisions on the evidence ability of accident investigation report,there are still some controversial issues such as the inability of accident investigation report to be classified into the types of statutory evidence,whether all parts of accident investigation report have evidential capacity,and the ambiguity of the rules for reviewing the evidence ability of accident investigation report.In order to standardize the application of accident investigation report in criminal litigation,it is necessary to further discuss how to break through the limitation of the types of legal evidence,clarify the evidence ability of each part of accident investigation report and improve its review rules from the aspects of relevance,legitimacy and reliability under the framework of our legislation.
作者
杨厚瑞
马成梅
YANG Hou-rui;MA Cheng-mei(Shandong University of Science and Technology,Qingdao,Shandong 266590)
出处
《司法警官职业教育研究》
2023年第3期35-42,共8页
Vocational Education Research of Judicial Police
关键词
刑事诉讼
事故调查报告
证据能力
审查认定
Criminal Litigation
Accident Investigation Report
Evidence Ability
Review and Determination
作者简介
杨厚瑞(1979-),男,山东青岛人,山东科技大学文法学院讲师,法学硕士,研究方向:证据法学、诉讼法学、犯罪学;马成梅(1998-),女,山东滨州人,山东科技大学文法学院诉讼法学研究生,研究方向:诉讼法学。
