摘要
无争议事实记载是调解与诉讼在事实认定方面的桥梁,《改革意见》虽已确定该记载与调解、诉讼的基本关系,但不足以判断其属性,造成了法官对该记载事实在后续诉讼中"无需举证"的效力认识不一。在与民诉法相关理论比较分析后可知,该记载只有被定性为诉讼外自认的特殊情形,才不致出现相关理论与制度错位,才能合理理解其效力。为防止当事人对"无需举证"效力的滥用,须建立严格的效力审查机制以保障当事人诉讼权利平衡。
Record of uncontroversial facts is a bridge between mediation and litigation in the identification of facts.Although Relevant Regulations have determined the basic relationship between the record and mediation and litigation,it is not enough to clearly determine its attributes.This has led to differences in the effectiveness of the record in the judicial practice.After comparative analysis with the relevant theories of Civil Procedure Law,it can be seen that the uncontroversial facts can only be reasonably interpreted as a special case of selfrecognition outside the lawsuit,so that the relevant theory and system dislocation will not appear,and the effectiveness can be reasonably explained.In order to prevent the abuse of the validity of the evidence,it is necessary to establish a strict effectiveness review mechanism to ensure the balance of litigant rights.
作者
毋爱斌
杜崇
Wu Aibing;Du Chong
出处
《私法》
2020年第2期-,共16页
Private Law Review
基金
重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学研究项目“人民法庭制度现代化转型研究”(18SKD003)
西南政法大学2018年度校级重点项目(2018XZZD-01)
西南政法大学法学院2019年度学生科研创新项目“民事调解无争议事实记载机制研究”(FXY2019083)
关键词
无争议事实记载
诉讼外自认
无需举证证明
法律效力
Record of Uncontroversial Facts
Self-identification Outside the Lawsuit
No Proof Required
Legal Effect
作者简介
毋爱斌(1983-),西南政法大学副教授、硕士生导师,西南政法大学人民法庭研究中心研究员,法学博士,主要研究方向为民事诉讼法与司法制度;杜崇(1995-),西南政法大学人民法庭研究中心研究人员,西南政法大学民事诉讼法专业2017级硕士,主要研究方向为民事诉讼法与司法制度。
