摘要
杨国荣先生主张以行为之事及其结果作为存在的终极依据。这有部分道理。从超越原理来看,事是基础。作为活动的事从哲学的角度来看,属于未成形的东西。没有形式的东西是不可以被认识的。因此,事不仅是形而上的,而且也是不可认知的存在。事情本身是事实,经验到的事实便是现实。我们通过反思现实才能还原或走向事实。事实即事情本身依赖于我们对现实的反思。中国古人的用有名词与动词两种用法,体现了古人不分事实与现实、无视了二者之间的区别。杨先生也忽略了这个细节。经验到的现实才是真正的基础。
Professor Yang Guorong holds that act and its affects is the final cause of being,which is right to some extent.In the aspect of transcendent principle,act is the basis,which is ahead of forming some actual being.The one which is advanced of formation is far from form and cognition.Hence,act is transcendent and unable to recognize.Act is reality,and the consciousness of which is actual.By reflection of those actual,we come to reality.Act or thing itself depends upon our reflection on actual beings.The classical Chinese word Yong was employed either as a noun which means utility,or a verb which means using.This double usage reflects the indifference of the idea between reality and being actual.Professor Yang ignores this detail.Those actual in consciousness is the real basis.
出处
《思想与文化》
2022年第1期245-262,共18页
Thought & Culture
关键词
杨国荣
事
事实
现实
Yang Guorong
Act
Reality
Actual
作者简介
沈顺福(1967—),男,哲学博士,山东大学儒学高等研究院教授,博士生导师,主要研究领域为中国传统哲学、中西比较哲学。
