摘要
算法日益深入人类生活并在社会话语体系中塑造了强大的算法权力。面对算法决策产生的伤害,现有的应对机制逐渐力不从心,为弥补不足,理论界提出一系列举措建议,包括要求算法的透明化或可解释性、成立算法监管机构等。然而这些建议均存在不同程度的局限性,并不能成为一般标准。对算法之规制,我们不应简单地从GDPR中移植相关的权利类型,而应着重从算法使用之行为及结果进行评价考量,以规范算法行为,实现算法可责性。
Algorithm has been deeply rooted in human life and has shaped a powerful algorithmic power in the social discourse system.Faced with the harms caused by algorithm decision making,the existing coping mechanism gradually failed.In order to make up for the deficiency,the theoretical circle put forward a series of measures and suggestions,including requiring the transparency or interpretability of algorithms,establishing an algorithm regulatory bodies,etc.However,these recommendations have varying degrees of limitation and do not constitute a general standard.For the regulation of algorithm,we should not simply transplant the relevant right types from General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR),but focus on the evaluation and consideration of the behavior and results of algorithm use,so as to regulate the behavior of algorithm and realize the accountability of algorithm.
作者
黄琪
张颖
Huang Qi;Zhang Ying
出处
《盛京法律评论》
2019年第2期-,共19页
Shengjing Law Review
关键词
算法伤害
算法规制
可责性
GDPR
Algorithm Harms
Regulation of Algorithms
Accountability
General Data Protection Regulation(GDPR)
作者简介
黄琪,安徽省明光市人民法院法官,研究方向:民商法学;张颖,南京财经大学法学院教授,研究方向:民商法学。
