摘要
混合担保下各担保人间是否享有追偿权在《物权法》时代就一直存在较大争议,进而在学术上逐渐形成了“支持说”和“否定说”两大观点。《民法典》物权编第392条延续了原《物权法》的条文,因此,关于混合担保下各担保人间是否存在追偿权的问题仍不明确。值得注意的是,《民法典担保制度司法解释》第13条明确了混合担保下各担保人间存在追偿权的情形:各个担保人之间约定可以追偿、各担保人承担连带担保,实质确立了“混合担保下,若无特殊约定,各担保人相互间应无追偿权”的规则。因此,在解决该类问题时要走出混合担保下各担保人间享有追偿权的理论误区,明确“除约定追偿和连带担保外,混合担保内部担保人之间不享有追偿权的立法目的”。
Whether the guarantors enjoy the right of contribution under the mixed guarantees has always been controversial in the era of Property Law,and then two viewpoints of"support theory"and"negation theory have gradually formed in academia.Art.392 of the property right series of the Civil Code continues the provisions of the original Property Law.Therefore,it is still unclear whether the right of contribution among the guarantors under the mixed guarantees exists or not.It is worth noting that Art.13 of the Interpretation of Guarantee System of Civil Code defines the situation of the right of contribution among the guarantors under the mixed guarantees:the guarantors have agreement about contribution and each guarantor shall undertake joint guarantee,which essentially establishes the rule that"under the mixed guarantees,if there is no special agreement,the guarantors shall have no right of contribution to each other".Therefore,when solving such problems,we should get rid of the theoretical misunderstanding of the right of contribution among the guarantors under the mixed guarantees,and adhere to the"negation of the internal right of contribution of the mixed guarantees in addition to the agreed contribution and joint guarantee".
作者
张金蕾
董泽瑞
Zhang Jinlei;Dong Zerui
出处
《盛京法律评论》
2021年第2期64-85,共22页
Shengjing Law Review
关键词
混合担保
追偿权
民法典担保制度解释
连带债务
mixed guarantees
the right of contribution
the Interpretation of Guarantee System of Civil Code
joint debt
作者简介
张金蕾,法学博士,大连海事大学法学院副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向:海商法;董泽瑞,大连海事大学法学院海商法硕士研究生,研究方向:海商法、民商法。
