摘要
伦敦基于海事仲裁的历史积淀、海事产业集聚优势以及良好的法治环境,长期以来一直是国际海事仲裁中心之一。中国(1)海事仲裁经历了60年的发展历史,从无到有,取得了可喜的成就,但目前仍与国际海事仲裁中心的发展目标存在较大差距,面临着国际认可度不高以及受案量少等发展困境。我国应从海事产业全局视角出发统筹规划,从仲裁法修改、海事司法、海事律师及海事法学教育支持的协同视角,创造海事仲裁发展的良好外部环境。但海事仲裁发展困境的破局,关键在于海事仲裁员以及海事仲裁机构。我国可参考"一带一路"争端解决机制的构建方案,秉持开放、共享的理念积极与境外仲裁员协会及仲裁机构合作,并借此提升自身专业水平,回归海事仲裁的服务本质,早日实现国际海事仲裁中心的发展目标。
London has long been one of the international maritime arbitration hubs with the historical accumulation of maritime arbitration, the advantages of maritime cluster and the favorable environment upholding the rule of law. China’s maritime arbitration has experienced 60 years of development, and has made gratifying achievements from scratch. However, it faces challenge such as poor international recognition and small portion of caseload and still has a long way to go to reach the development goal of establishing itself as the international maritime arbitration hub. China should make a whole plan from the perspective of the overall maritime industry, also from the cooperative perspective of the revision of arbitration law, maritime justice, maritime lawyers and maritime legal education, and to create a good external environment for the development of maritime arbitration. However, the key to the development of maritime arbitration lies in maritime arbitrators and maritime arbitration institutions. China can refer to the plan of "one belt, one road" dispute settlement mechanism, uphold the concept of openness and sharing, actively cooperate with overseas arbitrator associations and arbitration institutions, to enhance their own professional skills and focus on the service nature of maritime arbitration, and achieve the development goal of international maritime arbitration hub at an early date.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2020年第1期81-92,共12页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
海事仲裁
临时仲裁
国际海事仲裁中心
maritime arbitration
ad hoc arbitration
international maritime arbitration hub
作者简介
司玉琢,大连海事大学前校长;初北平,大连海事大学法学院院长;李垒,大连海事大学法学院博士研究生。
