摘要
申请法院确认仲裁协议效力案件的法律性质认识不清,导致在实务中出现了程序运行混乱的局面。鉴于非讼案件的本质、仲裁协议的公法契约属性,加之仲裁程序效率性要求和出于节约司法资源等方面的考虑,将申请法院确认仲裁协议效力案件定性为非讼案件更为适宜。因此,"诉讼化改造"法院确认仲裁协议效力程序是行不通的。但申请确认仲裁协议效力案件有其特殊性,我们有必要在制度设计上给予当事人更多的程序保障。
Because the legal nature of the court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement cases is unclear,it results in the situation that the practice is chaos.Taking the nature of procedure of non-contentious case,the contract of the public law attribute of arbitration agreement,efficiency requirements of arbitration procedure and save of the judicial resources into account,the court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement cases should be vested in non-contentious cases more suitably.Therefore,litigious reform of the court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement procedure is not feasible.But the court to confirm the validity of the arbitration agreement cases have their particularity,we need to give the parties more procedural protection in the design of the procedure.
出处
《仲裁研究》
2020年第2期59-68,共10页
Arbitration Study
关键词
法院确认仲裁协议效力程序
非讼程序
诉讼程序
诉讼化改造
The Court Determination the Validity of the Arbitration Agreement
Litigation Procedure
Non-contentious Procedure
Litigious Reform
作者简介
张超,北京市丰台区人民检察院检察官助理,法学硕士
