摘要
多方仲裁协议在当今国际商事活动中应用广泛,却因同一交易中不同合同签约的主体不尽相同、仲裁机构发生变更、概括约定仲裁条款等引发多方仲裁协议效力争议。通过归纳我国司法实践中多方仲裁协议效力产生争议的不同情形,总结我国法院在处理多方仲裁协议时的裁判思路,提炼其中的法律问题,并尝试给出应对建议,以期抛砖引玉之效。
Multi-party arbitration agreements are widely used in today’s international commercial activities.However,the validity of multi-party arbitration agreements is disputed due to differences in the parties to different contracts in the same transaction,changes in arbitration institutions,general agreements on arbitration clauses and so on.By summarizing the different situations of disputes arising from the validity of multi-party arbitration agreements in Chinese judicial practice,analyzing the judgment thinking of Chinese courts in dealing with multi-party arbitration agreements,and extracting key legal issues,this article attempts to give countermeasures in order to attract more legal colleagues’attention,and more and better suggestions.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2021年第5期93-109,共17页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
多方仲裁协议
补充协议
合意
合同相对性
multi-party arbitration agreement
supplemental agreement
consensus
privity of contract
作者简介
郎雪,武汉大学国际法研究所国际私法专业硕士研究生;刘经涛,中伦律师事务所合伙人、律师。
