摘要
股东派生纠纷是仲裁嵌入公司治理的关键环节。自仲裁法修订以来,我国的股东派生纠纷解决模式呈现出由股东派生仲裁的单轨制模式向双轨制模式发展的范式转型。“或裁或诉,诉裁并行”的双轨制救济模式,虽有可能被解读为赋予了公司股东提起派生仲裁或诉讼的程序选择权,但并未有针对性地弥合股东派生仲裁与股东派生诉讼在制度供给上的断裂。此外,该模式还存在纠纷主管碎片化、加剧矛盾裁判、诱发主管竞择行为等潜在风险,难以切实保障股东权益。有鉴于此,股东派生仲裁制度的转轨应着力于缩减诉讼与仲裁程序的结构性差异,强化仲裁程序保障的制度措施,加强仲裁立法与机构规则的协同互补。
Shareholder derivative disputes are a key aspect of arbitration embedded in corporate governance.Since the revision of the Arbitration Law,China’s Shareholder derivative dispute resolution mode has shown a paradigm shift from the single-track remedy mode of shareholder-derived arbitration to the dual-track remedy mode.Although the dual-track model has expanded the boundary of party autonomy by way of procedural options,it has not purposefully bridged the gap between shareholder derivative arbitration and shareholder derivative litigation in terms of system supply,and there are potential risks of fragmentation of the disputes in charge of the disputes,aggravation of contradictions in adjudication,and inducement of arbitral forum shopping in charge of the disputes,making it difficult to effectively protect shareholders’rights.In view of this,the institutional transformation of the shareholder derivative arbitration system should focus on bridging the structural differences between litigation and arbitration procedures,strengthening the institutional measures of arbitration procedural safeguards,and enhancing the synergy and complementarity between arbitration legislation and institutional rules.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2023年第6期24-39,共16页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
股东派生仲裁
股东派生诉讼
股东代表诉讼
公司治理
股东诉权
shareholder derivative arbitration
shareholder derivative litigation
shareholder representative litigation
corporate governance
shareholders’right of action
作者简介
张世超,清华大学法学院2021级博士生。
