摘要
随着社会经济活动日趋复杂化与创新化,当事人因商事往来所产生的争议也出现了侵权争议等纯合同争议之外的争议类型。尽管实践中已有大量可供参考的公开案例,但此类案例多存在结论含糊、说理缺乏逻辑、法律依据不明确等问题。通过对典型案例的研究可以发现,整体而言实践中对侵权案件仲裁管辖权的认定态度发生了从不认可到逐渐认可的变化;但在数人侵权案件中对仲裁管辖权的认定态度仍然没有达成一致。如何处理侵权案件管辖权的认定问题,离不开对传统诉讼和仲裁管辖权理论的明辨和梳理:对固有必要共同诉讼制度真实内容和价值取向的确认,是判断法院能否将数人侵权案件纳入同一案件进行管辖的基础;仲裁协议相对性理论和“有利于仲裁”原则,则是将涉仲裁协议的数人侵权案件引向仲裁进行管辖的依据。数人侵权案件究竟应由诉讼还是仲裁进行管辖以及如何分配管辖权,应以侵权事实的查明为出发点,以确定案件是不可分的固有必要共同诉讼还是可拆分的共同诉讼为案件管辖的分流点,再基于仲裁协议相对性和“有利于仲裁”原则的路径进行认定。
With the increasingly complex and innovative content of economic and social commercial activities,disputes arising from commercial activities among parties have also emerged beyond the scope of contracts such as infringement.Despite the existence of a large number of public cases for reference,most of them are unable to provide a standard answer in line with the logic of law and practice due to problems such as ambiguous conclusions and a lack of logical and legal grounds for reasoning.On the whole,the cases show a change of attitude from disapproval to acceptance of the determination of arbitration jurisdiction in tort cases by the relevant subjects.However,the problem of unclear recognition of arbitration jurisdiction still exists in multi-person infringement cases.The determination of jurisdiction cannot be separated from the clear identification and sorting out of traditional litigation and arbitration related theories.The core content and value orientation of necessary joint litigation are the basis for determining whether the court can jurisdiction multiple infringement cases under the same case.The relativity of the arbitration agreement and the principle of"proarbitration"will lead the jurisdiction of several person infringement cases to arbitration.The issue of whether infringement cases should be governed by litigation or arbitration should be based on the investigation of infringement facts.Then,it should be clarified that the case is an inherent necessary joint action that cannot be divided or a divisible action is a diversion point.Finally,the determination should be based on the scope of the arbitration agreement and the path of the“pro-arbitration”principle.
出处
《商事仲裁与调解》
2023年第6期103-117,共15页
Commercial Arbitration & Mediation
关键词
数人侵权案件
固有必要诉讼
管辖权认定
“有利于仲裁”原则
several person infringement cases
inherently necessary litigation
jurisdiction determination
pro-arbitration
作者简介
田雨酥,法学博士,主要研究方向为国际商事仲裁、民商法与法经济学,现任中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会案件经办人。
