摘要
我国现行企业法以经营场所界定住所,经营场所与住所混为一谈,往往以固定的经营场所作为企业设立的条件,住所被视为企业拥有的不动产,企业设立登记要求提交住所权属证明。这不仅使企业市场准入和大众创业、万众创新受阻,而且与企业运行实践中,住所与经营场所普遍分离的事实,以及淡化物理住所,去实体化、非财产化的大趋势不符。为降低企业准入门槛,优化营商环境,我国企业法应重新定义企业住所为"联系企业,确定法律文书送达和管辖的地址",促使其与经营场所分离,并对企业住所实行申报登记制,对经营场所则实行备案登记制。
China ’s current enterprise defines domicile by business place,the business premises confused with domicile,often taking a fixed business place as the condition for the establishment of enterprises,the domicile is regarded as the real estate by an enterprise,the enterprise establishment registration requires submission domicile ownership certificate. This not only hinders the market access of enterprises and mass entrepreneurship and innovation,but also contradicts the fact that domicile and business place are generally separated from each other in the operation practice of enterprises,as well as the general trend of despising physical residence,dematerialization and de-propertization. In order to lower the threshold of enterprise access and optimize the business environment,China’s enterprise law should redefine the enterprise domicile as "the specific address with the function of determining the effect of service of legal documents and jurisdiction",so as to separate it from the business site,and implement the reporting and registration system for the enterprise domicile and the record system for the business site.
作者
郭富青
GUO Fu-qing(College of Civil and Commercial Law,Northwest University of Political and Science and Law,Xi,an 710063,China)
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2020年第2期145-156,共12页
Modern Law Science
关键词
企业住所
经营场所
市场准入
分制改革
enterprises’ domicile
business place
market access
separation system reform
作者简介
郭富青(1962),男,河南开封人,西北政法大学民商法学院教授,博士生导师。
