摘要
《人民法院第五个五年改革纲要(2019—2023)》为审判委员会改革赋予了新的内涵,意味着其履职再造的路径应在司法责任制的大框架下重构,在保留个案讨论职能的基础上,更侧重于发挥总结审判经验等宏观指导职能,继续完善专业法官会议制度。应该进一步明确审判委员会委员的人员选择机制,案件的会议讨论标准,建立案件过滤机制,细化议事规则,切实落实审判委员会委员的司法责任。同时,还应进一步厘清专业法官会议和审判委员会的功能区分、职责定位,以利于合议庭更好地梳理案件事实和证据,适用法律并做出公正裁判。
The fifth five-year reform outline of the people’s court(2019-2023)has given new connotation to the reform of the judicial committee,which means that the path of its performance and reconstruction should be reconstructed under the framework of judicial responsibility system.On the basis of retaining the function of case discussion,more emphasis should be laid on giving play to the macroscopic guiding function of summing up trial experience.It is necessary to further clarify the personnel selection mechanism of the members of the judicial committee,the criteria for case discussion,establish the case filtering mechanism,refine the rules of procedure,and earnestly implement the judicial responsibilities of the members of the judicial committee.
出处
《现代法治研究》
2020年第3期41-54,共14页
Journal of Modern Rule of Law
作者简介
拜荣静,兰州大学法学院教授,博士生导师。
